DrParasite
The fire extinguisher is not just for show
- 6,289
- 2,162
- 113
Spinning out of the Texas ENA letter thread, I had a question for those paramedics who were employed in ERs, or knew about the topic.....
1) are you hired as a paramedic (job title and everything), or was paramedic a prerequisite for the job?
2) if you were hired as an ER tech, what classroom training did your hospital provide to you?
3) if you were hired as a paramedic, were you able to function as a paramedic in the ER, or was your scope of practice modified because you were working in an ER?
my reason for asking is as follows:
when I was living in NJ, a good friend of mine got a job at the local hospital/trauma center as an ER tech. EMT was helpful, but not required for the job. once she was hired, she was given 160 hrs of training, monday to friday, 9 to 5, for 4 weeks, on how to be a tech. topics covered included taking a 12 lead, BGL testing, PPE, and basically everything she needed to know to do the job. I don't know all the details, but typically the turnover was high, and many of the applicants were nursing students looking to get hospital experience.
They made about $13 an hour, which is why many who were EMTs transferred to EMS for the pay raise and better working environment.
Everything you could do was "in house only," your "scope of practice" was whatever the hospital administration and emergency room physician administration said you could do. there was no formal credentialing process, no certification you received, and if you left for another hospital, you would have to retake their in house training. but you were allowed to do more than a typical EMT, and a typical lay person. But it was still all at the hospital discretion.
Does it work differently in other places, and if so, how?
1) are you hired as a paramedic (job title and everything), or was paramedic a prerequisite for the job?
2) if you were hired as an ER tech, what classroom training did your hospital provide to you?
3) if you were hired as a paramedic, were you able to function as a paramedic in the ER, or was your scope of practice modified because you were working in an ER?
my reason for asking is as follows:
when I was living in NJ, a good friend of mine got a job at the local hospital/trauma center as an ER tech. EMT was helpful, but not required for the job. once she was hired, she was given 160 hrs of training, monday to friday, 9 to 5, for 4 weeks, on how to be a tech. topics covered included taking a 12 lead, BGL testing, PPE, and basically everything she needed to know to do the job. I don't know all the details, but typically the turnover was high, and many of the applicants were nursing students looking to get hospital experience.
They made about $13 an hour, which is why many who were EMTs transferred to EMS for the pay raise and better working environment.
Everything you could do was "in house only," your "scope of practice" was whatever the hospital administration and emergency room physician administration said you could do. there was no formal credentialing process, no certification you received, and if you left for another hospital, you would have to retake their in house training. but you were allowed to do more than a typical EMT, and a typical lay person. But it was still all at the hospital discretion.
Does it work differently in other places, and if so, how?