mycrofft
Still crazy but elsewhere
- 11,322
- 48
- 48
In my opinion...
The recent tragic death of a talented and really good looking actress due to an epidural haematoma is going to lead to scores of patients demanding CT's and MRI's due to headaches. Let us ask ourselves some questions:
1. Who stands to profit from this (follow the money)? Other than the news organizations of course.
2. Given that such scanners are not as prevalent as BP cuffs, experience periods of compromised or curtailed performance, and the folks reading these results are not robots but human, which patients are going to get the bigger part of this zero-sum competition's resources?
3. What will this do to insurance rates and dwindling public health coverage dollars?
4. Instead of being the gorgeous daughter of famous show business parents, wife to box-office star and mother to two kids, what if she was short, fat, and had traffic warrants? Or was a part-time EMT-B?
Of the most likely CVA's to come from this sort of mishap, an epidural haematoma (versus subdural bleed of any sort, or an unsequesterd transdural bleed) could be the slowest to present given the same rate of haemorrhage due to whatever resistance of the dura to compression there is (versus direct unresisted compression beneath the dura), and the lack of the immediate irritation of the brain matter by direct contact with blood or fragments of skull or foreign matter. Not quite a magic zebra bullet but getting there.
This one would likely have been missed for as long as it was in any event, unless there was a historic component such as extant vascular problems or anomalies, prior trauma, tox screen for alcohol/NSAIDS/any other agents which could mask or exacerbate the onset of symptoms, or even a history of recurrrent unreleated HA's which the pt mistook this for.
So sez me.:sad:
Yes, every case that slips through should promote discussion, but we need "E!" TV and People Magazine to butt out.
The recent tragic death of a talented and really good looking actress due to an epidural haematoma is going to lead to scores of patients demanding CT's and MRI's due to headaches. Let us ask ourselves some questions:
1. Who stands to profit from this (follow the money)? Other than the news organizations of course.
2. Given that such scanners are not as prevalent as BP cuffs, experience periods of compromised or curtailed performance, and the folks reading these results are not robots but human, which patients are going to get the bigger part of this zero-sum competition's resources?
3. What will this do to insurance rates and dwindling public health coverage dollars?
4. Instead of being the gorgeous daughter of famous show business parents, wife to box-office star and mother to two kids, what if she was short, fat, and had traffic warrants? Or was a part-time EMT-B?
Of the most likely CVA's to come from this sort of mishap, an epidural haematoma (versus subdural bleed of any sort, or an unsequesterd transdural bleed) could be the slowest to present given the same rate of haemorrhage due to whatever resistance of the dura to compression there is (versus direct unresisted compression beneath the dura), and the lack of the immediate irritation of the brain matter by direct contact with blood or fragments of skull or foreign matter. Not quite a magic zebra bullet but getting there.
This one would likely have been missed for as long as it was in any event, unless there was a historic component such as extant vascular problems or anomalies, prior trauma, tox screen for alcohol/NSAIDS/any other agents which could mask or exacerbate the onset of symptoms, or even a history of recurrrent unreleated HA's which the pt mistook this for.
So sez me.:sad:
Yes, every case that slips through should promote discussion, but we need "E!" TV and People Magazine to butt out.