NPO
Forum Deputy Chief
- 1,831
- 897
- 113
So I know that just looking at Lead II or III or any lead for that matter on the monitor is usually considered nondiagnostic, if it's not in 12 lead mode. And I know that the 12-lead mode uses different filters to reveal things that monitoring mode might otherwise cover-up.
But how come (assuming no gain is applied) sometimes the monitoring mode shows significantly more ST elevation than the 12 lead? I've had multiple times when you look at the monitor, or even a printed rhythm strip, and think you've got a STEMI, but no matter what you do, you can't get it to show up on the EKG. What gives?
Case in point, just my most recent that got me thinking...
I looked down and saw large STE on leads II, and III on the monitor. The patient had a significant cardiac history and was very symptomatic for ACS. I did an EKG and the and the STE was negligible and hardly discernable. What gives?
I'm using an LP15, but I've also had this happen on Zolls.
Side bar thoughts on the EKG are also welcomed.
The STE was obvious on a printed strip, but the digital one is attached anyway.
But how come (assuming no gain is applied) sometimes the monitoring mode shows significantly more ST elevation than the 12 lead? I've had multiple times when you look at the monitor, or even a printed rhythm strip, and think you've got a STEMI, but no matter what you do, you can't get it to show up on the EKG. What gives?
Case in point, just my most recent that got me thinking...
I looked down and saw large STE on leads II, and III on the monitor. The patient had a significant cardiac history and was very symptomatic for ACS. I did an EKG and the and the STE was negligible and hardly discernable. What gives?
I'm using an LP15, but I've also had this happen on Zolls.
Side bar thoughts on the EKG are also welcomed.
The STE was obvious on a printed strip, but the digital one is attached anyway.