Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Splint in place if possible, and if able, provide pain relief. Pain may increase if/when autospliting begins to occur. The quads and hamstrings can be quite powerful, and difficult to overcome if you're having to provide traction to relieve pain.
If you DO decide to provide traction splinting, document the heck out of it. They're going to want to know that there really was an open Fx because the risk of infection is much higher than if the skin remained intact.
Little clinical evidence exists to support the use of traction in the preoperative management of midshaft femur fractures. Nevertheless, many orthopedic surgeons advocate immobilizing well-aligned fractures, with or without neurovascular injury, in a skin traction device [2,28,29]. Those who support the use of traction claim that it reduces patient discomfort, improves fracture alignment, and may resolve problems with arterial flow. A systematic review of studies of traction for proximal femur (ie, hip) fractures found no clear benefit; comparable studies have yet to be performed in midshaft femur fractures. (See "Hip fractures in adults", section on 'Initial management'.)
Skin traction splints can be used for both closed and open fractures of the femoral shaft. Hare or Thomas traction splints are most commonly used. The device is attached to the ankle at one end and secured against the pelvis at the other. Traction is applied by pulling the ankle distally while the proximal end braces the pelvis to prevent it from moving, thereby enabling distraction of the femoral fracture fragments.
Splint in place unless distal pulse/motor/sensation is affected. I would urge providers to never reduce an open fracture if it can be avoided because osteomyelitis is not fun.
If the Fx has the bone still sticking out of the skin, traction splinting can be done, but you want to make sure that you document what you found before you apply traction. Either way, the patient is going to get antibiotics in an attempt to reduce the chance of allowing an infection to take hold. Also, if you do apply traction, you're going to have to apply a considerable force. The reason is that since the quads and hamstrings will contract, and this can cause the broken bits of the femur to grind against other bony fragments or dig into the musculature - both cause pain.Aren't we NOT supposed to traction splint compound femur Fxs? That would leave a piece of bone "floating" giving a greater chance of it to shift and cause further injury, no?
Infection is the biggest concern. Internal bleeding is a concern to me, but a remote one, but that can be managed, and with increased tension put on the musculature, you're going to see a decrease in bleeding as smaller capillary beds, arterioles, and such will have some tamponade effect. You're also going to see a slight decrease in the cavity volume after the reduction.I agree with this, infection and the possibility of internal bleeding caused by reducing an open fracture isnt going to benefit anyone.
If the Fx has the bone still sticking out of the skin, traction splinting can be done, but you want to make sure that you document what you found before you apply traction. Either way, the patient is going to get antibiotics in an attempt to reduce the chance of allowing an infection to take hold. Also, if you do apply traction, you're going to have to apply a considerable force. The reason is that since the quads and hamstrings will contract, and this can cause the broken bits of the femur to grind against other bony fragments or dig into the musculature - both cause pain.
As the article that JP posted suggests, there is little benefit to using a traction splint in a hip (femoral neck) fracture. In my experience, and in the experience of an Orthopedic Surgeon that I have had a chance to work with, mid-shaft femur fractures do benefit from traction splinting precisely because of the improvement in patient comfort. Being that most of those Fx's will be repaired surgically anyway, there won't be much clinical benefit to prehospital traction splinting of mid-shaft femur Fx, except for perhaps blood flow improvement, if it's compromised.
Much of the info in the article was "new" stuff about 12-15 years ago. It is nice to know that info hasn't changed much since then.
Too True.There's not a lot of science to support using a traction splint with an open or closed Femur Fx. Isolated mid shaft Femur Fx are fairly rare since someone who sustains enough trauma to cause a Fx to the biggest bone in the body probably has other significant injuries as well.
The infection thing is pretty much a myth too. Anyone who has any sort of open injury is going to get a broad spectrum anti biotic pretty quickly, especially if they are going to the OR. You don't think that all those knives and bullets are sterilized before they are used, do you?
Sadly, much of what we do in EMS is based on past practice, myth, and anecdote.
Remember that the plural of war story is not data.
The number one reason for traction splinting is pain relief! Take it from someone that has multiple Femur fx's, it is a night and day difference with traction. I will take traction over Morphine, any day!
Slight tangent regarding infectious control, but I thought bullets heat-up significantly that infenction isn't a problem because of the bullet itself being sterile or not before being shot, but rather it being an open wound. Just what I thought.You don't think that all those knives and bullets are sterilized before they are used, do you?
You don't think that all those knives and bullets are sterilized before they are used, do you?