Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Damn Vene you make my medical knowledge look like crap, guess thats why I'm not rolling round in an orange jumpsuit yet.
My professional opinion is that this patient is pretty crook :unsure:
Would it ever occur to you that this should be a flight patient?
I have a feeling you're asking for one of two reasons. A), you're curious as to what could have caused it, or B.) you wonder if there was more you could have done to change the outcome.
The answer to B.) is almost certainly No. This guy's problem was definitely something surgical, and there's nothing else that could have been done in the field to fix it.
As for possible Dx... I think only an autopsy could say the actual cause of death. But from what you're describing, I'm going to agree with everyone else, something tore open/off and he bled out internally.
^^^ Not necessarily.
To all appearances this man had a syncopal episode, and those vitals immediately after aren't surprising. It would be concerning if the patients vitals stayed that way, but this patient's vitals improved, which is what I would also expect in a syncopal episode.
A syncopal episode is always pathologic, even in older people.
In my simple mind:
No history + new pain and syncope = ED
I was thinking AAA until I saw this BP: 148/106? I think I have seen one confirmed AAA, and he was pretty hypotensive the entire way to the hospital. to have his pressure spike like that seems odd to me (assuming it was always taken on the same arm).BP: 148/106
RR: 26 bpm
HR: 134
O2: 99%
He was then rushed and flown to a more advanced hospital to be sent to the cath lab.. He coded halfway in flight and wasn't brought back.
squeezing as much fluid as we could into him to get his BP somewhat stable..
Perhaps a little initially but not so much for me personally. The decomp shock presentation is clearly representative of more than just kidney stones. Also typically kidney stones by itself usually wouldnt cause someone to fall without defending it or bracing it. Remember that typically an abdomen can hold up to a liter and a half without showing outward signs, rigidity, discoloration, etc. So if you have a rigid and distended abdomen I would be thinking that we have lost alot of blood in the abdominal cavity.
Hemm pancreatitis, bowel perforation, AAA, lower GI bleed, splenic rupture, you get the point.
Hemodynamics typically dont change that much with a kidney stone or appendicitis.
Did the patient see blood in urine? Any associated fever lately? BP and pulses in all extremities, any difference? Associated back/retroperitoneal pain? Shoulder pain or does the patient feel like they have to take a dump?
Lots of etiologies are differential diagnosis by hands on assessment and proper questions.
Sometimes the best thing we can do is take the patient to the hospital.
I was not there so I am not going to arm chair it but hopefully you and your partner can learn something from this patient.
Also for the true AAA we are not going to be able to do anything with it, you just hope you have enough time to get to a surgeon.
Good luck.
The old saw about unequal blood pressures may be of very little use. It is very common for there to be some variation in blood pressure between the arms, even in normal patients. For there to be a difference in blood pressure due to a thoracic aneurysm, the aneurysm would have to arise from the ascending aorta or aortic arch and impact upon one or other of the subclavian arteries; it would therefore most likely present with different symptoms than the case described..
She never actually said the abd was distended though. She said "maybe...maybe not". Given that it is perfectly reasonable for the DD to include kidney stones.
I don't think it's out of the realm of reality for the pain from passing a kidney stone to cause a syncopal episode.
Is this some kind of failed shortcut for an Ankle/brachial index?
The A/B indix is very useful but as the name says, it is measuring the difference between the arm and the leg, not both arms.
Also keep in mind that an A/B ndex is not specific, all it tells you is there is some kind of vascular compromise somewhere.
especially in older people, they could have multiple chronic vascular compromises so I am not sure in a case like this if you could call the results indicative of acute pathology.