amessernremtp
Forum Probie
- 15
- 0
- 0
True.. .but rather not let it get to that point
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'd perfer a cric to a retrograde intubation though. If your putting a hole in the neck, why not just put a tube in it?
The main argument against a retrograde in this setting isn't the argument over putting a tube in subglottic versus transglottic but rather that we often won't have a long enough needle to perform a retrograde in a morbidly obese patient. This means you'd have to use a modified technique and at that point, you're right- just put in a cricothyrotomy.
The main reason retrograde intubations have their place is that a crike isn't a long term solution so the person either winds up trached formally or has an ETT passed down orally. Think of it as saving a step. LOL
Interesting thoughts, different angle with another host of issues...have we made it to the hospital yet?
No, just making a point though for educational purposes.