Is this normal? - ET Tubing

mcdonl

Forum Captain
468
0
0
So, first three attempts... I successfully get the tube in the esophagus....

Instructors shows me, I get the stomach again.... he says just quit, I am not cut out for it (You have to know him to love him....) ;)

Then...

He Suggests.... "Don't stick the blade in so far, and try to pry the mandible off the skull and you may have better luck...."

I also took the time to envision the anatomy upside down, and by the end of class I could do the tube in less than the required 30 seconds!

It was a roller coaster ride indeed but man, didn't it feel good!
 

exodus

Forum Deputy Chief
2,895
242
63
Look for the vagina in the throat!
 

akflightmedic

Forum Deputy Chief
3,891
2,564
113
Here is a great piece of advice for you as well.

In practice or in real life...if you ever stick the tube in the esophagus, do NOT remove it!

Leave it in place, grab a second tube and this time go for the hole which does not have a tube sticking out of it.


Make sense?

There is never really any prying when using the laryngoscope. You need to lift up and away from yourself to properly visualize.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

usalsfyre

You have my stapler
4,319
108
63
Plan on spending as much time as necessary with Fred the Head till you can intubate him upside down, backwards in the dark with any blade that is big enough to move the anatomy needed. Why? Because other than the motions involved, intubating a dummy is nothing like a true human. There is a notable lack of slimy stuff in the dummy, as well as the fact that his anatomy is perfect, stiff and structured and in the same place all the time.

So why, if practice doesn't resemble real life, is practice important. Simple, if you have the actual, physical manipulations required to pass a tube down pat, your much more free to focus on controlling the tongue, locating the appropriate anatomy and passing the tube, rather "am I doing this right".

I highly, highly recommend viewing the Airway Cam videos if you have access to them as well. While it's not actually manipulating anatomy, you will get to see a lot of different sets of cords in real patient populations.

Hopefully your program actually includes a chance to intubate real, live humans in a controlled environment with close supervision. If not, be aware that what your getting is akin to playing paintball a couple of time and then going out and getting into a gunfight, with real, deadly consequences. Understand that no matter what, you are woefully under-prepared to be managing airways by yourself, and seek to improve at every juncture.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

FLEMTP

Forum Captain
322
1
0
Plan on spending as much time as necessary with Fred the Head till you can intubate him upside down, backwards in the dark with any blade that is big enough to move the anatomy needed. Why? Because other than the motions involved, intubating a dummy is nothing like a true human. There is a notable lack of slimy stuff in the dummy, as well as the fact that his anatomy is perfect, stiff and structured and in the same place all the time.

So why, if practice doesn't resemble real life, is practice important. Simple, if you have the actual, physical manipulations required to pass a tube down pat, your much more free to focus on controlling the tongue, locating the appropriate anatomy and passing the tube, rather "am I doing this right".

I highly, highly recommend viewing the Airway Cam videos if you have access to them as well. While it's not actually manipulating anatomy, you will get to see a lot of different sets of cords in real patient populations.

Hopefully your program actually includes a chance to intubate real, live humans in a controlled environment with close supervision. If not, be aware that what your getting is akin to playing paintball a couple of time and then going out and getting into a gunfight, with real, deadly consequences. Understand that no matter what, you are woefully under-prepared to be managing airways by yourself, and seek to improve at every juncture.

This is a good piece of advice.

I dont understand for the life of me... how or why anyone or any organization would do anyone the disservice of putting on a paramedic class with no real hands on human intubation experience in it?

I also dont understand why anyone would shortchange their education by attending a class that didn't let you actually intubate a real person.. or several real people!
 

TransportJockey

Forum Chief
8,623
1,675
113
This is a good piece of advice.

I dont understand for the life of me... how or why anyone or any organization would do anyone the disservice of putting on a paramedic class with no real hands on human intubation experience in it?

I also dont understand why anyone would shortchange their education by attending a class that didn't let you actually intubate a real person.. or several real people!

Here in NM it's a problem of actually getting OR time, sicne the hospitals are largely going to LMAs for their elective surgeries. There is only one hospital that allows students into it's OR in the entire northern 2/3s of the state (not sure about southern NM at all) and since it has a med school attached, they would rather get their med students and CRNAs rotation time. I didn't get my first tube until internship.
 

usalsfyre

You have my stapler
4,319
108
63
Here in NM it's a problem of actually getting OR time, sicne the hospitals are largely going to LMAs for their elective surgeries. There is only one hospital that allows students into it's OR in the entire northern 2/3s of the state (not sure about southern NM at all) and since it has a med school attached, they would rather get their med students and CRNAs rotation time. I didn't get my first tube until internship.

I think this is another case that comes back to educational quality and what's better, a few programs putting out high quality, well prepared and rounded graduates, or a lot of programs pumping folks through. Until we can get the states to recognize this fact though, the educational debasement will continue.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

TransportJockey

Forum Chief
8,623
1,675
113
I think this is another case that comes back to educational quality and what's better, a few programs putting out high quality, well prepared and rounded graduates, or a lot of programs pumping folks through. Until we can get the states to recognize this fact though, the educational debasement will continue.

I agree. And I would put the medic program I went through up against any in the nation in terms of quality. The ET tube situation is the only point where it has problems, but that's a NM thing due to us just not having a lot of hospitals. Hell we only have 1 Lvl1 in the entire state! Man I got weird looks when I was in Denver when I said that :p
 

usalsfyre

You have my stapler
4,319
108
63
Dangit, I'm gonna sound like Ventmedic but....

Do you think if there were fewer crap programs around more hospitals might allow students to do clinical time there? Just a thought.
 

CAO

Forum Lieutenant
204
1
0
Here in NM it's a problem of actually getting OR time, sicne the hospitals are largely going to LMAs for their elective surgeries.

Same around here with the LMAs. During our clinical orientation, we were told to count them as intubations anyway. On top of that, we only have to have five of them.

Unfortunately, I saw the eyes of the bare minimalists light up upon hearing that.
 

TransportJockey

Forum Chief
8,623
1,675
113
Same around here with the LMAs. During our clinical orientation, we were told to count them as intubations anyway. On top of that, we only have to have five of them.

Unfortunately, I saw the eyes of the bare minimalists light up upon hearing that.

They wouldn't consider that with us, mostly cause we'd been using LMAs since day one of Basic class, same with MLAs. I'm glad they didn't cause then we would have had people slack off even more and be content that they could jsut use LMAs or Combis (which I know have their place, and I'm even inclinced to grab a King or Combi if it's a tough airway and don't have a lot of time)
 

TransportJockey

Forum Chief
8,623
1,675
113
Dangit, I'm gonna sound like Ventmedic but....

Do you think if there were fewer crap programs around more hospitals might allow students to do clinical time there? Just a thought.
Out of two hospital systems (3 hospitals each) plus the state lvl 1 trauma in Albuquerque, we could do clinicals in 1 of the systems and the trauma center. The other hospital system (which I worked for at one point) didn't let medic students do clinical time there because they took the majority of the nursing students and didn't have the space to let medic students in.

In NM we are lucky that we have no real medic mills. We have 2 AAS programs and 1 BS-EMS program. I think there might be a certificate program still in the eastern part of the state too, but they are all run and operated by community colleges or 4 year schools.
 

MasterIntubator

Forum Captain
340
0
0
Look for the vagina in the throat!

Ehh ehh.. I like you. Awesome, made my day.... hope its not copyrighted... cause I'd like to use it. :p:p

Wow AKflight.. have not heard that in a loooong time. That is something we used to practice regularly with EOAs. I loved the EOA... it plugged the puke hole, and it was a great bite block after intubating. <sigh... memories.. >

orig post... keep practicing, it will come. Sometimes you have to change your technique up a bit... the 'book way' is not always the best way for you. Try different handles, different angles, use different muscles in your wrist and arm. Since its sometimes heard to explain, I'm gonna try to shove some pics up for you. I tend to hold near the laryngoscope joint, its more relaxing, and makes me use a different angle. Sometimes you have to get an extra 'toy' to make it work well for you. Look at other folks' technique... try it out. There is one out there for you.
 

Attachments

  • tube 1.jpg
    tube 1.jpg
    38.9 KB · Views: 246
  • tube 2.jpg
    tube 2.jpg
    68 KB · Views: 206
  • tube 3.jpg
    tube 3.jpg
    73 KB · Views: 260

MasterIntubator

Forum Captain
340
0
0
And.. some more... showing just my hand placement on the set. I use a peds handle with whatever blade I choose to use.
The second ( pic 2 and 5 ) just shows a Howland lock, which just gets rid of the 90 degree tooth breaking angle in tight cavities. ( just one of the toys that makes it easier for me )

Hopefully you will find yours.
 

Attachments

  • tube 4.jpg
    tube 4.jpg
    29.3 KB · Views: 222
  • tube 5.jpg
    tube 5.jpg
    30 KB · Views: 237
Last edited by a moderator:

akflightmedic

Forum Deputy Chief
3,891
2,564
113
You calling me old???

I am just amazed at how students are not taught different techniques. Intubating does not require you to get on your belly to do you "thang". I see so many people get locked into one method and that is all they stick with never venturing to try something different.

Pad under the pts shoulders, pull them to end of table, bed, stretcher, whatever it is and let gravity work with you! When you let them hang so they resemble a Pez dispenser, it is amazing how little laryngoscope help you need.

Sit them up in semi-fowlers and stand behind them. Try it, it works!

Have a partner stand over the patient and A) lift them by the arms to allow head to fall back or B) straddle the patient and insert the laryngoscope and let your P use his force and better angle to open the airway and all you have to do is tag the hole. (Hatchet method)

There are so many different ways to become better at it including making it a team sport! Never be afraid to ask for help or hand off if it just is not your day. This is not about you or your ego, it is about the guy who is not being ventilated.

Thought I would throw in a few more tid bits, hope ya'll don't mind.
 

Aidey

Community Leader Emeritus
4,800
11
38
I love telling students about leaving the esophageal tube in...It amuses me to watch the light bulb go on in their head. ^_^ Two holes...one is already plugged...lol

Our medical directors are pushing the "most appropriate airway" rather than "the most advanced". They want people thinking about CPAP and the King instead of just ETI ETI ETI. There has been talking of getting the recert rules changed so that instead of a certain number of ETIs a year, all of your advanced airway interventions are looked at, so CPAP and Kings count too. You would still be required to have some ETIs, just not as many.
 

Veneficus

Forum Chief
7,301
16
0
Dangit, I'm gonna sound like Ventmedic but....

Do you think if there were fewer crap programs around more hospitals might allow students to do clinical time there? Just a thought.

I think at one time that might have been true. But there are a host of factors in play now.

As was pointed out, there are fewer tubes going around. In the hospital, with attendings, residents, RTs, CCT teams, etc. The field medic in most places is at the very bottom of the list. A medic student even lower.

Medicare doesn't help either. They no longer pay for complications that are considered "preventable." Insurance companies often don't pay for anything medicare won't. That means the hospital eats the cost of anything that goes wrong. Not exactly a proeducation environment.

There are simply too many paramedics. The US is saturated in many parts. In some areas everyone who wants to even fill out a fire application has to be a medic first. have seen a department with 70 medics on roster and average 10intubations a year in the whole service. Even if you wanted all those people to get a tube in the hospital, it may not be possible.

Even for medical students, it seems in the US they are permitted to do less and less every year. If nobody is going to let somebody with at least 2 years of graduate medical education touch a patient, who is going to let a paramedic student?

Brave men and their proud simulators. There is big money in simulation. There are major efforts underway, including a bill making its way through congress that will mandate every provider must recertify skills in "official" sim labs every few years to qualify to get reimbursed via medicare. I know one of the authors and he claims that simulation technology is the safest way to practice. Very true, but you will never hear him say the "most effective." He is also on the payroll of a company that makes a lot of money in medical simulation. What a coincidence...

If you really need Fred the head to be more realistic, cut the tongue away from the base of the mouth, spray 1/2 can of lube in there and then dump in some campbell's chunky vegetable soup. Makes one hell of a mess, but a way better simulator than an unmodified Fred the head.

I think at this point even if you cut out all the "suspect" and diploma mills, it wouldn't change much. About the best you can hope for is a cadaver lab. But they come with a premium price too.
 

MasterIntubator

Forum Captain
340
0
0
Ehh ehh ehh .... I always get the deer in the headlights stare from youngers when I talk about stuff like that... so.. I guess you can say that I called you 'old' :p:p:p

Someone earlier brought up about what they teach these days in class... and it does seem the whole airway thing is just another chapter with minimal skills practice. It used to be the most studied and practiced with tons of options and ideas.
 

usalsfyre

You have my stapler
4,319
108
63
I love telling students about leaving the esophageal tube in...It amuses me to watch the light bulb go on in their head. ^_^ Two holes...one is already plugged...lol

Our medical directors are pushing the "most appropriate airway" rather than "the most advanced". They want people thinking about CPAP and the King instead of just ETI ETI ETI. There has been talking of getting the recert rules changed so that instead of a certain number of ETIs a year, all of your advanced airway interventions are looked at, so CPAP and Kings count too. You would still be required to have some ETIs, just not as many.

I'm all about the most approprite airway, from simple stimulation up to and including surgical cric. But....

CPAP is not an airway intervention. In fact, if the pt is not fully in control of their airway it's totally inappropriye and dang near negilgent to place a sealed mask over the patients airway. An incredibly useful adjunct to oxygenation and vetilation, absoloutely. Staves off a large number of intubations, sure. An airway control device, not by a long shot.

Further, dropping. King or LMA is not equivilant to placing an ET tube under direct larengoscopy. The fact that paramedic programs and medical directors are saying they're the same, and then letting folks go out and place ET tubes when they may have not have done DL in months or years scares the crap out of me.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Top