RocketMedic
Californian, Lost in Texas
- 4,997
- 1,462
- 113
19 y/o F c/o recurrent hyperventilation x2 days with multiple ER visits (1 discharge after coaching, 1 discharge after sedation). Med Hx of pediatric febrile seizures (stopped at 2 y/o), no current or relevent medical history, not pregnant, medications Xanax (out x 1 week) and depo shot, allergic to PCN. Complaining of severe pain, hyperventilation, SOB, carpopedal spasms of hands and feet, spasms to arms and legs as well, onset while lying in bedroom (same onset multiple times, home heater is off, rest of family is asymptomatic, no index of suspicion for hypoxia or CO poisoning). Initially encountered supine in back seat of car, very anxious, CAOx4, RR30/normal volume/normal effort, SpO2 100%, EtCO2 26 mmHg, P100, BP 130/90. Carpopedal spasms were evident, x30 minutes, pain 10/10. Anyways, I assessed this as anxiety-induced hyperventilation. Seeing as how the whole "NRB at 4L/min" is dangerously close to malpractice and this is a problem caused by hyperoxygenation, I decided on a slightly different course of treatment- 2mg of Verced initially followed up with another 3mg slow push to a total of 5mg to relieve the spasms, along with coaching. Patient's carpopedal spasms rapidly resolved after verced administration, pain was entirely resolved, patient remained CAOx4 throughout the transport (and much calmer!), coached RR to 20/normal, pulse remained around 90, EtCO2 increased to 32 over approximately 20 minutes with complete resolution of symptoms and a transient headache that resolved, O2 sats remained at 98-100%. A few of my coworkers opined that I should have done the low-flow NRB or a paper bag and withheld the verced. I'm pretty sure that I've done right by my patient and stayed within protocol, and I was able to justify it, but I'd like your take on this.
My thoughts: coaching has failed, and although sound, it's not going to relieve the spasms or pain in a realistic amount of time. This patient's follow-on care is going to be anxiety management, which is outside of my scope. For my role, the concern is her pain (caused by muscle spasms), which are being caused by hyperoxygenation and hypocarbia. Increasing the concentration of CO2 in rebreathed air would eventually "help" her by relieving presumed respiratory alkalosis/hypocarbia, but she's still going to hyperventilate and has proven to simply continue to do so with discontinuation of "paper-bag therapy". I learned in school that it's not appropriate to paper-bag our patients, especially those who are in pain, and that pain is likely going to render coaching a futile exercise. Verced (with protocols for sedating an anxious patient) nicely gift-wraps spasm relief and sedation for us, allowing the patient to relax and titrate her CO2 levels back towards normal, relieves pain, and makes her feel better. Thus, it's a better treatment modality than induced hypercarbia until the spasm breaks or "she'll live with it", which are the alternates proposed.
Your thoughts? (I'm still pretty new, and this is the first time I've run across this, trying to do right by my patients).
My thoughts: coaching has failed, and although sound, it's not going to relieve the spasms or pain in a realistic amount of time. This patient's follow-on care is going to be anxiety management, which is outside of my scope. For my role, the concern is her pain (caused by muscle spasms), which are being caused by hyperoxygenation and hypocarbia. Increasing the concentration of CO2 in rebreathed air would eventually "help" her by relieving presumed respiratory alkalosis/hypocarbia, but she's still going to hyperventilate and has proven to simply continue to do so with discontinuation of "paper-bag therapy". I learned in school that it's not appropriate to paper-bag our patients, especially those who are in pain, and that pain is likely going to render coaching a futile exercise. Verced (with protocols for sedating an anxious patient) nicely gift-wraps spasm relief and sedation for us, allowing the patient to relax and titrate her CO2 levels back towards normal, relieves pain, and makes her feel better. Thus, it's a better treatment modality than induced hypercarbia until the spasm breaks or "she'll live with it", which are the alternates proposed.
Your thoughts? (I'm still pretty new, and this is the first time I've run across this, trying to do right by my patients).