If you don't know the cost, how do you know they are as costly as you have "heard"? In a profession that fails to police itself about a lot things including patient care, why should employers look the other way with illegal activity? Don't you think that it would end up costing them more?
i almost feel like youre arguing with me for the sake of arguing. like i already said...
-i dont know the exact cost, only that they cost more than the standard drug test they already use (this was from a dept. higher up, it could be wrong but ive heard it from other places as well)
-i never said employers should look the other way, in fact i said the opposite (random drug testing).
-and i just acknowledged that it would cost them more (see my previous post about money spent on prevention saving greater sums of money in future hassles associated with not testing).
come on man, im just discussing an issue that probably needs discussing in our line of work and throwing out some of different sides of the argument. no need get so defensive about it, and especially accuse me of being a drug user when im clearing against such things.
Last edited by a moderator: