Stem Cell Treatment May Help Repair MI Damage

Sasha

Forum Chief
Messages
7,667
Reaction score
11
Points
0
Stem Cell Treatment May Help Repair MI Damage
Full Article: http://www.medpagetoday.com/CriticalCare/MyocardialInfarction/13574
ORLANDO, April 2 -- An infusion of autologous bone marrow progenitor cells may improve outcomes for patients who suffer a severe myocardial infarction, a phase I study suggested.

Patients who received the highest doses of enriched CD34+ endothelial progenitor cells in the affected vessel had increased perfusion of the infarct at six months (P=0.01), according to Arshed Quyyumi, M.D., of Emory University in Atlanta.

This is the first study to find a dose response when using enriched progenitor cells to repair damage following an MI severe enough to cause ventricular remodeling, he said at the American College of Cardiology meeting here.

Although it is unknown whether this treatment will improve clinical outcomes, he said, a 2007 meta-analysis of similar studies conducted mostly outside the U.S. demonstrated a significant reduction in MIs, and trends toward reductions in death, admissions for heart failure, and repeat revascularization.
 
Stem cell research has a long list of potential medical problems it can repair, it really is amazing.
 
Stem cell research has a long list of potential medical problems it can repair, it really is amazing.

And it really is amazing how many people are against it!
 
That it is, so what they have to use a fetus. Its not like that fetus would be alive if it werent for the research, might as well make some good come out of it.
 
That it is, so what they have to use a fetus. Its not like that fetus would be alive if it werent for the research, might as well make some good come out of it.

Snipped from the article...
"An infusion of autologous bone marrow progenitor cells"...do you know the definition of each word in this sentence?

A class in Biology or AnP 1 teaches us about stem cells...not just the stem cells you hear about in the media which come from other fetuses but the stem cells within our bodies which produce other types of cells.

Main Entry:
au·tol·o·gous
Pronunciation:
\ȯ-ˈtä-lə-gəs\
Function:
adjective
Etymology:
aut- + -ologous (as in homologous)
Date:
circa 1921

1 : derived from the same individual <incubated lymphoid cells with autologous tumor cells> 2 : involving one individual as both donor and recipient <an autologous blood transfusion>


Main Entry:
pro·gen·i·tor Listen to the pronunciation of progenitor
Pronunciation:
\prō-ˈje-nə-tər, prə-\
Function:
noun
Etymology:
Middle English, from Anglo-French progenitour, from Latin progenitor, from progignere to beget, from pro- forth + gignere to beget — more at kin
Date:
14th century

1 a: an ancestor in the direct line : forefather b: a biologically ancestral form
 
And it really is amazing how many people are against it!

Most of those people are against harvesting stem cells from embryos. I have yet to meet someone opposed to stem cell research in itself, though I have no doubt they exist.
 
Most of those people are against harvesting stem cells from embryos. I have yet to meet someone opposed to stem cell research in itself, though I have no doubt they exist.

What is wrong from harvesting it from embryos? If the embryo will be aborted regardless, you might as well put the cells to good use that may benefit others.
 
What is wrong from harvesting it from embryos? If the embryo will be aborted regardless, you might as well put the cells to good use that may benefit others.

I have foresworn ethical discussions here.
 
I have foresworn ethical discussions here.

Don't bring it up if you don't feel you can discuss it!

I believe he's bowing out of a possible ethical debate here, Sasha, to prevent him being involved in the thread taking a negative turn and risk getting this thread closed. Your OP is good let's keep it going. However, I'm afraid there might be an arguement ensueing if left unchecked. And arguing something on the ethics of anything involving politics or religion is as productive as digging a tunnel to China... with your forehead. Noone wins the arguement. All it does is create adamocity.

Now back on target. Your information is intreguing. It does make you think. Thank you.
 
Back
Top