Should Health Officials Have to Be Healthy and Trim?

Sasha

Forum Chief
Messages
7,667
Reaction score
11
Points
0
Should Health Officials Have to Be Healthy and Trim?
Full Article Here: http://www.lemondrop.com/2009/07/16...6/should-health-officials-have-to-be-healthy/
President Obama has nominated Regina Benjamin for Surgeon General, but instead of people being totally psyched about her MacArthur genius award, her impressive charitable works, or her down-to-earth working-class background, everybody is trying to guess her BMI. Some people think a country plagued with obesity should not have an obese person representing our nation's health care.


Thoughts? Agree? Disagree?
 
hmm, well i can say that when a person who may be overweight or unhealthy starts giving advice on how to be healthier or lose weight it would definitly cause some head scratching seeing how some people may be why should I do that if you are not doing it. I guess its a set an example for everyone else kind of thing, thats how i would assume most people would look at it. As for myself even if that my person doesnt live up to what they teach, I may listen if what they teach is useful.
 
I would agree that the surgeon general should need to be healthy as a representative for the nation’s health. i.e. how seriously do you take the warning labels on a pack of cigarettes from the surgeon general if s/he smokes like a train? However, BMI is not the end-all-be-all to determine health. Fit and trim are two separate concepts. I have seen plenty of people who have a low (statisticlly healthy) BMI that are soooo not healthy and know people with a higher BMI that are in better shape than me.

Maybe she is a little more overweight than Americans believe she should be, but that doesn't make her unhealthy in of itself, and for all we know she has medical issues herself (and weight might be a manifestation of that). Having dealt with medical issues herself (including weight) could make her a good choice, since she understands the challenges that Americans personally face in regards to health. In all honesty, we would need to know more about her and her health, before jumping to conclusions.

On the other hand... these are always political decisions and I have no faith in politicians... so it will probably be a bad choice, but not for any physical appearance reasons.
 
I would agree that the surgeon general should need to be healthy as a representative for the nation’s health

A large number of American's are overweight, she is an accurate representation of America's health.

Edit: Sorry, I misread, thought that said of, not for.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It would be nice to have a good role model in that position although the Surgeon General's job description is quite diverse.

But then not all choices by Presidents have been carefully thought out.
When Arnold Schwarzenegger was appointed to the President's Council for Fitness and Sports it was an endorsement for steroids.
 
is this role a figure head?

i would like to know she was chosen on merit and not looks. and perhaps she knows the challenges of fitness
 
Might as well have someone who is overweight and therefore "appears" unhealthy to be a representative of our nation's health.

Our nation's standard approach to most medicine is to either prescribe drugs to suppress S/Sx, or perform surgery to address the problem. Big Pharma wants us to be dependent on their meds, not to be cured. Modern medicine has little interest in preventing illness/disease. There's too much money to be made in treatments, procedures, and long term med therapy. It's simply not lucrative to keep us healthy, as there will be no business for cancer therapies, heart surgery, diabetic complications such as amps, CVA Tx, MI's HTN > dialysis, etc.

Think about it, an adult typically progresses to type 2 diabetes due to insulin resistance from an overabundance of carbs. So what is modern medicine's answer? Oral hypoglycemics! Now the pt can keep eating like they were, which was the problem in the first place. Along with all of the assosciated risk factors of the diabetic such as PVD, HTN, cardiac disease, neuropathy, CVA's, amps and such, the pt may eventually become insulin dependant as well. Changing the pt's diet to that of fruits/veggies/lean meats/eggs/nuts/fish oil, and cutting out all grain based carb sources, with an appropriate exercise regimen, would most likely allow the pt to reverse their condition, and also enable them to discontinue the orals.

Just wait until Big Pharma succesfully lobby to get vitamins and such classified as drugs, then jack up the price, making it unaffordable to many of us, further predisposing us to disease.

So, an overweight Surgeon General is appropriate for this nation.
 
It goes along with a President that smokes.

Unfortunately they are also representing some of the stereotyping which also has been noticed by the media.
 
She seems pretty capable, so I don't really care.

Bad role model? Playing into the stereotype of the fat black woman? Seriously? She's a very successful and well-respected doctor, and has a great record of community service. Qualifies her as a great role model in my book for anyone, and she just might be another point of encouragement for overweight black schoolgirls whose aspirations aren't taken seriously. Sure, it would be nice if the surgeon general and all public health officials were perfectly fit and trim... but I think it's a minor thing to worry about.

I can't help but notice, though, that the only two appointees I've heard the BMI thing about are her and Sotomayor...
 
Might as well have someone who is overweight and therefore "appears" unhealthy to be a representative of our nation's health.

Our nation's standard approach to most medicine is to either prescribe drugs to suppress S/Sx, or perform surgery to address the problem. Big Pharma wants us to be dependent on their meds, not to be cured. Modern medicine has little interest in preventing illness/disease. There's too much money to be made in treatments, procedures, and long term med therapy. It's simply not lucrative to keep us healthy, as there will be no business for cancer therapies, heart surgery, diabetic complications such as amps, CVA Tx, MI's HTN > dialysis, etc.

Think about it, an adult typically progresses to type 2 diabetes due to insulin resistance from an overabundance of carbs. So what is modern medicine's answer? Oral hypoglycemics! Now the pt can keep eating like they were, which was the problem in the first place. Along with all of the assosciated risk factors of the diabetic such as PVD, HTN, cardiac disease, neuropathy, CVA's, amps and such, the pt may eventually become insulin dependant as well. Changing the pt's diet to that of fruits/veggies/lean meats/eggs/nuts/fish oil, and cutting out all grain based carb sources, with an appropriate exercise regimen, would most likely allow the pt to reverse their condition, and also enable them to discontinue the orals.

Just wait until Big Pharma succesfully lobby to get vitamins and such classified as drugs, then jack up the price, making it unaffordable to many of us, further predisposing us to disease.

So, an overweight Surgeon General is appropriate for this nation.

If that is true, why were antibiotics over prescribed at one point? Why is there all this money being dumped into stem cell research, cures for cancer, cures for AIDS, etc?

Why would so many hospitals (At least my local ones and ones I've visited around florida at my old IFT job) put so much time and effort into patient education for patients who have heart attacks, recently been diagnosed with diabetes, etc.? Weight management?

Bariatric surgery? Would it not be more profitable to keep them fat and at a higher propensity for all the diseases associated with obesity such as heart diseae, adult onset diabetes, strokes, high cholesterol? If their goal was simply to suppress and not to cure?

When my mom was diagnosed with adult onset diabetes secondary to obesity she recieved a lot of education on how to control her diabetes through diet and exercise and the like, however she chose NOT to. It is not all about the pharmacuetical companies not trying to prevent or cure, sometimes it's about the people themselves refusing to follow directions.

And vitamins SHOULD be considered drugs and regulated better with more patient education. They are just as dangerous and people often forget to mention them as "medicine lying around" when Little Susie is exhibiting signs and symptoms of iron toxicity because she really likes her flintstone vitamins.

Take off the tin foil hat.
 
She seems pretty capable, so I don't really care.

Bad role model? Playing into the stereotype of the fat black woman? Seriously? She's a very successful and well-respected doctor, and has a great record of community service. ..

Not everyone looks at education and qualifications. Look at EMS. How many times a day do we have a discussion about how worthless education is by someone.
 
Back
Top