Does the child have any signs of trauma?
The eyes rolling back indicated a chance for brain injury to me.
With the low SPO2, can also indicate some shock.
Family reports no trauma. Pt. was being held by family when all of this started.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Does the child have any signs of trauma?
The eyes rolling back indicated a chance for brain injury to me.
With the low SPO2, can also indicate some shock.
Do they have any other children. First time parents usually report the worst and usually are not a reliable source of information in my expereince.
Kids crying = good sign.
Kids fussing = good sign.
Any inspiratory stridor?
Hows her color? She nice and pink or blue on the tips?
I guess a SZ is a possibility, she been sick, temp anyone else at home sick?
As was stated above by alpha monitor airway and transport.
I'll throw in this bit: when you get to the hospital and transfer care, their initial SPO2 reading is 27%. Child is still awake and alert. That's correct...twenty-seven percent. Both you and the tech say "that can't be right" with good harmony.
def key to know v/s before, during, and after the syncope. This is prob a situation where I'd be on the phone with a doc and id be seriously considering tubing the child.
- Atonic seizures. The child would have the period of flaccid unresponsiveness, and the child waking up angry, and this can happen multiple times a day. No other seizure activity fits, as the rest involve non-flaccid muscle activity.
- Vaso-vagal syncope. The vasoconstriction would cause the 27% reading, and the cerebral vasoconstriction causes syncope. This could be caused by a FBAO causing a vagal response by rubbing the carotid sinus, because if it's popcorn and she's 18-m/o, it could be really big compared to her narrow funnel of an airway.
I considered vagal stimulation 2ndry to FBAO but you would expect to see some changes in heart rate wouldn't you?
If the SPO2 reading is correct...some kind of atrial septal defect maybe? My understanding of pulse oximeters is that they are accurate only down to a certain saturation, lower than that they tend to be inaccurate. It could be that the kid has a much higher (although still very low) SpO2.
I also considered the bradycardia that should happen 2* to the vagal, which is why I wanted the vitals before/during/after. ;D
Yeah, I thought about a heart defect, but figured it HAD to have been picked up by 18mo, wouldn't it? It'd be so extremely rare to have a child go 18-months and then suddenly be this awkwardly symptomatic.
But if the SPO2 was even semi-correct, how is the child so pink and warm and responsive? If that was somehow correct, there's no way the kid's pulse would be that high.