This is the scenario: upon arrival (als & bls pulled up together) find 80y/o male in cardiac arrest. no shock-able rhythm, after 20-30 min of CPR+ meds we get a pulse back, en route we lose it, get it and lose at hospital a couple of times(don't remember how many) My question is that the last time we lost it, we did CPR for about 5 min before the doc called it. Do you think he called it to early?
My First Arrest
- Thread starter CAR1
- Start date
Shishkabob
Forum Chief
- 8,264
- 32
- 48
Now ay did he call it too early. 30 minutes is really pushing the envelope as is. Just because you get a pulse back doesn't 'reset the clock' on death, as the heart beating doesn't instantly fix the acidosis, MODS, etc etc of prolonged arrest.
d_miracle36
Forum Crew Member
- 87
- 0
- 6
What was the downtime before effective CPR was started? Mayo Clinic has a article about a prolonged resuscitation guided by capnography that led to discharge with full reovery after 10 days. But you had no shockable rhythm however so I would say it was a good call.
Last edited by a moderator:
- 9,736
- 1,174
- 113
We had a pt with an ETCO2 of 36 this morning that we pronounced. Asystolic throughout the arrest.
Between prearrival and us he was worked for 52 minutes. Even if we had gotten a pulse back the chances of having anything more than a vegetable were slim to none.
That mayo clinic story is crazy but truly is one and a million.
Between prearrival and us he was worked for 52 minutes. Even if we had gotten a pulse back the chances of having anything more than a vegetable were slim to none.
That mayo clinic story is crazy but truly is one and a million.
d_miracle36
Forum Crew Member
- 87
- 0
- 6
Yeah and I believe if the stars line up like they did in that one it can happen. Witnessed arrest, trained responders on scene, refractory v-fib. Then again I may just be young and naive