joemt
Forum Lieutenant
- 233
- 0
- 0
I was having a discussion with a "colleague" yesterday and we disagreed on the following scenario... please read this and give me your opinion on how you think this situation should be handled.
Your on a Rural Volunteer Fire Dept, that also runs Medical calls(but does not transport). You receive a dispatch that ends up being a "full code"... you arrive at the same time or shortly after the ambulance.... you administer CPR, and provide "assisting" care (suctioning, being the IV Pole, loading the patient, etc).... The ambulance has obtained their information on the call.... Do you as a member of the Rural Volunteer Fire Dept. need to follow up with your own documentation, or can you just let it go, because the ambulance personnel on scene completed theirs. The argument is.. since this is a BLS call (somehow we're now separating running "CPR based" calls from other medical calls).. that documentation is not needed.
What do you think? I'd tell you what side I was on, but don't want to slant opinions posted
Your on a Rural Volunteer Fire Dept, that also runs Medical calls(but does not transport). You receive a dispatch that ends up being a "full code"... you arrive at the same time or shortly after the ambulance.... you administer CPR, and provide "assisting" care (suctioning, being the IV Pole, loading the patient, etc).... The ambulance has obtained their information on the call.... Do you as a member of the Rural Volunteer Fire Dept. need to follow up with your own documentation, or can you just let it go, because the ambulance personnel on scene completed theirs. The argument is.. since this is a BLS call (somehow we're now separating running "CPR based" calls from other medical calls).. that documentation is not needed.
What do you think? I'd tell you what side I was on, but don't want to slant opinions posted