There was one other thing I mentioned, and I don't think I've seen anyone comment on it yet. And that's that in the Wikipedia article—which again, has no references that I noticed, at least for this part, so I have no idea how accurate this is or not, which is kind of why I'm asking about it—said that the serrated clamping surface is actually counter-intuitively less harmful to tissue than a smooth surface would be. I believe the article said this is because you can use less pressure with the serrated tips. Does anyone know if this is correct, or sounds plausible?
I'm not sure if I really buy that or not. Maybe it's true if I'm manually holding just enough pressure on the forceps to clamp something, but if I lock it, that's another story. If I lock the forceps on an ordinary piece of paper, even on the first lock setting, holes get left in the paper. Now I know an artery is tougher than a piece of paper, but it's also thicker, which seems it would take more force to squeeze the handles together enough to get them to lock, which in turn means more force being exerted on the artery, or whatever is in there.
I just...I just don't see how the serrated surface can not rip up or shred or otherwise damage an artery, vein, or other tissue. But all the Kelly forceps I've ever seen have been serrated, and part of me wants to assume they're like that for a reason.