As Tigger explained we can start IV's up here in Colorado, but I'll have to add that it requires a totally seperate class...I believe mine was 24 hours total plus ten successful sticks in the clinical setting. So you can be a Basic in Colorado and NOT have authorization to start IV's. You can also be a Basic WITH IV approval, but it requires the extra class and clinical time.
IVs for EMT-B
- Thread starter musicislife
- Start date
Achilles
Forum Moron
- 1,405
- 16
- 38
What about IO and IM?
wildmed
Forum Crew Member
- 53
- 0
- 0
I also am from co. Emt -iv is pretty much the standard here. It has been very Successful but I'm guessing it may be phased out by the integration of AEMT in the next 5 years. As someone who initiates iv access on very small children on a daily basis and has at least 1000+ ivs under his belt, id say it has been is a very appropriate add on for EMTs here. I must admit that with the first bunch of AEMT students rotating through my ED, I am fully convinced that this should be the entry level to EMS, and a lot of the EMS leaders in the frontrange seem to agree.
the_negro_puppy
Forum Asst. Chief
- 897
- 0
- 0
Little point if they can't give anything through it. Even if they had a limited scope such as in cardiac arrests etc to help prep for ALS- they would not be performing the skill enough to remain proficient
NYMedic828
Forum Deputy Chief
- 2,094
- 3
- 36
Thank goodness for you grammar and understanding of the english language is not a requirement of EMS.
But yes, this is the main argument against the protocol.
The less people that could potentially slow CPR to administer vasopressors the better. The last thing we need is more people racing to shoot someone up with 5mgs of epi.
Last edited by a moderator:
Achilles
Forum Moron
- 1,405
- 16
- 38
Still waiting for an answer....
Our service allows deep IM injection of epi for anaphylaxis (because epi pens are $100+), but I see ZERO reason to give Basics IO access...
Shishkabob
Forum Chief
- 8,264
- 32
- 48
To start IOs. ^_^
NYMedic828
Forum Deputy Chief
- 2,094
- 3
- 36
What do you intend to do with the IO once you insert it? Just because I can tell anyone to press the button on a cordless screwdriver doesn't mean I should.
IM has the same issues of understanding of medications. Only real difference is I don't need an IV in place which is preferable regardless. Sure many people can pick up on it and all will be well but not all people. You can't do something in the light of some people when the ultimate group is far larger.
Even narcan the simplest of drugs has its potentially lethal side effects.
Last edited by a moderator:
Achilles
Forum Moron
- 1,405
- 16
- 38
You can't always get into a vein, you can almost always get into the femur.
Shishkabob
Forum Chief
- 8,264
- 32
- 48
Except we typically don't do IOs in the femur.
Last edited by a moderator:
What life-saving heroics are you going to perform with said vascular access?
NYMedic828
Forum Deputy Chief
- 2,094
- 3
- 36
You are 100% correct. We can't. Thats why the IO is the last resort. It is not the first. And the fact still remains that once you have an IO, what do you plan to do with it? A patient better be circling the drain or already down the pipes if you decide to start an IO. At that point, we have bigger concerns than just "having access."
I don't know how things are done by you. But that statement by me would be digging your own grave on the matter. The sternum in some areas is accepted and everywhere else I know of goes for the tibial site. The femur is not accepted anywhere I know of pre-hospitally. You would need a specialized set to do it to begin with. (longer needle)
Last edited by a moderator:
Shishkabob
Forum Chief
- 8,264
- 32
- 48
This is where I disagree. I don't label things as "first" or "last", but as needed. I have no issue jumping to IO right off the bat, and although my medical director doesn't like IOs and prefers IVs, the protocols he wrote specifically state that if IV access is deemed to be difficult, to skip right to the IO.
NYMedic828
Forum Deputy Chief
- 2,094
- 3
- 36
Sorry I probably could have worded that better. I don't mean last resort in the sense that I wasted 5 minutes trying to stick someone 10 times without success so I finally grabbed the IO. I meant that if we can easily get an IV instead, we should. If my patient is still alive id prefer not to drill a hole in their bone if I don't need to.
I certainly have looked at a patients arm/neck and decided to go right for the IO. It definitely saves time and effort but that still adds no viability at the EMT level.
Last edited by a moderator:
Achilles
Forum Moron
- 1,405
- 16
- 38
I will let you know what I plan to do with as soon as I become a para-magician.
Btw, Michigan btw.
I'm also just a basic, so i was just asking a question.
IO access as a medic, useful. As a basic? Pointless.
NYMedic828
Forum Deputy Chief
- 2,094
- 3
- 36
Smoke and mirrors my friend.
You were defending your argument so we defended ours. No harm done we are all here to learn from one another.
Last edited by a moderator:
Achilles
Forum Moron
- 1,405
- 16
- 38
The OP is an MFR, do you think he should be starting IV's?
NYMedic828
Forum Deputy Chief
- 2,094
- 3
- 36
No... I thought that was made pretty apparent by this point. :unsure:
Last edited by a moderator: