Intubation facts when performed on our own

V

VentMedic

Forum Chief
Messages
5,923
Reaction score
1
Points
0
I saw this on another forum and after reading it I feel compelled to share the information on this forum. I believe more emphasis should be on thorough initial training and competency maintenance closely monitored when it comes to intubation.

Fire Fighter Fatality Investigation and Prevention Program

http://www2a.cdc.gov/NIOSH-fire-fig...Related=0001&Trauma_Related=ALL&Submit=Submit

These are cardiac and not trauma related deaths.

The information by NIOSH is largely about FF fitness for duty. However, the medical data for intubation success that was discovered during the investigation is disturbing.

I am quoting the findings of mitllesmertz1 from the forum EMSresponder.
http://forums.emsresponder.com/showthread.php?t=95563

You can read through the investigative reports and also confirm what he has found.


Total of 22 reports where CPR was initiated and ALS measures were implemented, from roughly 2005 through 2007.
I counted reports where an "advanced" airway was attempted ( there were a few combitubes placed).
Here's what I found:

7 Completely Failed intubation attempts (BLS used instead)
11 succesful intubations.
(only 8 were succesful on first attempt)
2 of the "succesfuls" were in gut at ED arrival, unrecognized in field.
1 LMA, placed "sideways" at ED arrival, unrecognized in field.
1 dislodged-recognized in field-reintubated.

So, out of 22 reports, 7 failed completely.
2 (and 1 LMA) were either misplaced, or were dislodged, but both unrecognized.

This adds up to a first-attempt succes rate of 8/22, or 36%.
Total succes rate was 11/22, or 50%.
3/22, or 13.6% were unrecognized failures, or unrecognized dislodges.
Click to expand...
 
While that success rate isn't good, 22 tubes is a pretty small sample size.
 
Doughboy, there have been numerous studies published that highlight the low success rate of intubation by prehospital providers. This is a national problem, and one that needs to be addressed now. People aren't educated as properly as they should be, and fail to maintain proficiency once they are trained. Some systems maintain that their paramedics perform "X" amount of successful intubations per year to maintain their card....yes I know this isn't feasible in rural and even suburban areas, but there needs to be some sort of proficiency training in place to keep this trend from happening. OR time, cadaver labs, ER time, heck...some of these new simulators they come out with nowadays are downright tough...but there needs to be something put in place to keep up a skill some providers only do once or twice a year.

Here's a few sites highlighting this trend:

http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/22/1/64

http://ccforum.com/content/10/s1/p64

http://content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/content/abstract/25/2/501
 
Thanks, Murph... you'll notice I didn't comment on how good or bad EMS is at intubating. I'm familiar with both the extent of the problem and the barriers to improving the success rate. However, note that all 3 studies you linked me to report a pre-hospital intubation success rate of 70 to 80 percent, versus the 50% some guy found while sorting through reports. The law of large numbers applies. The outcome of 22 intubation attempts in a pool of hundreds of thousands of EMS tubes per year is, simply put, not a representative sample.
 
This were incidental findings for FFs and from their cardiac events.

It reminds me of an article published not to long ago on the chances of surviving an inhospital code. For a couple of these investigative reports, there should have be FR or some ALS on standby since they were fire scenes. If you missed a tube on one of your co-workers, I believe that would be "significant" regardless of the whole sample size.

The ability to intubate should be a skill that is performed frequently enough in some setting for proficiency to where it is second nature so that the focus is then other ALS skills while knowing the airway is secure.
 
I agree completely. i also think that it should become a basic skill as well so that the medic on scene can attend to other things. the lma and combitubes are great and all but they are too hard to place on sealing airways from trauma or shock. i would much rather take 2 stabs then having to fight a simple tube for a minute.
 
What I do NOT understand is why intubations keep arriving in ED in the wrong place? With so many detectors such as EtCo2 w/waveform; one can immediately detect lost of tube placement and still good assessment techniques.

I am totally against EMT Basics performing any more "skills". Why would we want to allow lower license/certified individuals to attempt such procedure if one with higher and more in-depth education, already have poor outcomes? Even the most simplistic "skills" can be overwhelming. to many basics, just read the posts They are trained for "basic" maneuvers, they have very little to no anatomy and physiology, no introduction to critical thinking skills and we want to place more, especially intubation on a 150 hour trained individual? That's not fair for them, the system, nor the patient!

Again, we are trying to mix skills with education level and performance, outcomes. One cannot do such.

R/r 911
 
true, i took basic school so long ago that i cannot remeber what was learned. i think that it seems so basic for me know that it is common knowledge. but i would beg that an intermediate should not to be able to intubate either due to the fact that they usually only get another 150 hours of training in which they have to remeber a ton more complex algorithims and such. i do agree though that they should spend a little more time in the intubation portions of medic schools.
 
I understand that, but really is even150 hours long enough? Apparently, how and what we are teaching is NOT working... Maybe, airway techniques alone should be 150 hours. I know my intubation clinicals required 24 adult, 10 child, and 2 pediatric. Yes, they were hard to obtained and yes it stressful. The whole point, as one of the contributing factors of performing a skill successfully is feeling confident, in which I did.

R/r 911
 
Ridryder911 said:
I know my intubation clinicals required 24 adult, 10 child, and 2 pediatric. R/r 911
Click to expand...
Whats the difference between a child and pediatric? Do you mean neonate?
 
At least in the video, they had a partial rebreather on during the arrest. ;)

Instead of calmly humming and effectively intubating, most folks rush and do haphazard work. Now this, this right here... is where our stats kill us in the field.
If you miss.... No biggie, pull out and start bagging or use another tool.
It is an art, and most of it is in your attitude, demeanor and requires you to be calm and effective. There is no way around it.
In the surgical suite, the anesthesiologists are about as calm as anything, drives many medics nuts! 45 seconds went by since the last ventilation, and they are talking about breakfast while slowly grabbing their tools. They know 2 minutes will not harm a patient with a non-complicated airway ( as most are non-complicated ), and they can have the tube in right after do the direct laryngoscopy. ( 5-10 seconds )... without a drop in SaO2. ( thats another subject ). --- Point is... you have time!
 
MasterIntubator said:
In the surgical suite, the anesthesiologists are about as calm as anything, drives many medics nuts! 45 seconds went by since the last ventilation, and they are talking about breakfast while slowly grabbing their tools. They know 2 minutes will not harm a patient with a non-complicated airway ( as most are non-complicated ), and they can have the tube in right after do the direct laryngoscopy. ( 5-10 seconds )... without a drop in SaO2. ( thats another subject ). --- Point is... you have time!
Click to expand...

During my OR clinicals, a few of us were assigned to the anesthesiologist we called the "10minute" Dr. On our first rotation with him, he would spend about 30 minutes with us educating us about calming down, taking our time, and realizing we actually have about 10 minutes to get the patient intubated. He went on to explain when you have a properly "denitrogenated" (did not like the term preoxygenate.....long explanation) patient, you can take your time. He explained the percentage of of O2 drop each minute a pt is not breathing... ect.

When we got into the OR, on our first patient with him he would first make us bag the patient for what seemed like FOREVER....but was actually about 2-5 minutes, depending on his assessment of your ability to properly do it. Then he would be talking..... at one point he said, "I could leave the pt, walk to the cafeteria and get another cup of coffee, and come back. I would still have time to get her intubated without any need to rush."

I asked him how that would apply in the field, where we are not working under the same conditions as a wonderfully prepped surgical patient. He told me is comes down to simply taking time to properly bag the pt to ensure maximum denitrogenation. He asserted, even in a cardiac arrest patient.

I feel like it has helped me. Granted, I have yet to excercise my "10 minutes" on my apenic patients, however even as new as I am I have yet to get that Oh Crap I better get this done now going on. I know I have driven my EMT's with me, and even some of the ALS providers, absolutely nuts when I RSI'ing or getting ready to intubate. I have been told on more than 1 occasion, I need to show more of a sense of urgency in getting it done. When we talk about it, they all have said it took me "forever" to get it done, when in reality it hasn't, it just wasn't a paniced rushed thing.
 
One of the trauma attendings where I took my critical care course told us in a lecture, "It takes at least 10 'atta-boys' to fix one 'oh-sh*tter'". He was referrencing to any mistakes made, but it can also be make towards the mindset. If you ever think "oh sh*t", then you'd better start making some "atta-boys"... quick.

If you're ever "b*lls-to-the-wall" on anything, you're automatically behind the 8 ball.

The competent get the job done. The good get the job done regardless of the situation. The damn good get the job done regardless of the situation, and get told how easy it looked by their peers/superiors.

That's where I want to be when I grow up.;)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think intubation should not be performed by a basic even though I have been practicing and I can now intubate in less than 30 seconds on a mankin. I am not good enough to go out in the field and intubate yet because i can only use a mac blade and I still need a stlylete. My instucter says until you can use either a mac or a miller and no stylete you are not readyto intubate on a real person and I agree. The more I learn in my paramedic class the more it scares me to stay a basic. I want to hurry up and become a paramedic. FYI the paramedics are responsibable for what the basics do under them according to the Borrowed Servant Doctrine. You may be liable for any negligence act they comment. So are you going to let a basic intubate under you?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Princess, I like the fact in the OR you are made to ventillate the patient, this is an aquired skill that many cann't do. As they say if you cann't do the basic's...

With new CPR, tubin' should be the last thing to worry about.

As for the video, personally, I would probably do a pulse check at least before I tried to get the patient to stand.

I know scoop and run is in vogue again, however, I like an IV with my TV.
 
Actually, child was < 12 and pediatric < 3 years of age, infant < 1 year of age, neonate < 1 month of age.

I always describe airways as ..easy, hard, and OH H*ll ! Alike, what has been discussed preparation both mentally and equipment is part of the key.

With the introduction of such devices as EtCo2 waveform and monitors, good patient assessment there is NO reason to deliver a patient with an ET tube in the gullet. Want to present a poor representation of what EMS is.. there ya go !

It is our standard to run a EtCo2 strip upon arrival to ED; documenting that ET was properly placed. This immediately stopped the display of residents attempting to acclaim that the arrival of the patient was not properly intubated. In fact, our intubation rates in comparison (even without the use of RSI) was remarkably higher > 72%. Again, even being a "small" service realize the potential of innuendos.

Again, proper education and re-enforcement through refreshers, and good CQI. After encouragement, we finally placed flex guide (Bougie elastic guide) which also adds to increased successful intubations. After implementing them, large metro EMS in my area now has a 99% intubation rate... not bad for over 175,000 calls a year. Of course one does not read about the millions of successful intubations... I do wish Wang would get a hobby or a life, almost of all of his studies has always emphasized poor outcomes in EMS. Ironically, I do not recall reading any other studies produced by him.

Personally, I believe intubation is easier than placing a NG tube. Again, it is not the skill that not only needs to be emphasized but the entire airway system. Understanding detailed anatomy, landmarks, and a full understanding of the airway respiratory pathophysiology is the key to making procedures and treatment successful.

R/r 911
 
emtlady76877 said:
My instucter says until you can use either a mac or a miller and no stylete you are not readyto intubate on a real person and I agree.
Click to expand...

I knew there was something else!! He also wouldn't allow a stylette. Again with the long explanations as to why you don't actually need a stylette.....

That was probably the best thing for me. Even as an EMT setting my partner up for an intubation....and now when I am getting my own stuff together...... I ALWAYS forgot to put the damn stylette in.

I can say though, I don't get nearly enough intubations. I had 5 last month, but before that it had been 2 months before I had one....and now its almost a month since my last. Those 5 were all cardiac arrests (3 that coded in front of us). Its been 6 months since I RSI'd someone....
 
MedicPrincess said:
I knew there was something else!! He also wouldn't allow a stylette. Again with the long explanations as to why you don't actually need a stylette.....

That was probably the best thing for me. Even as an EMT setting my partner up for an intubation....and now when I am getting my own stuff together...... I ALWAYS forgot to put the damn stylette in.

I can say though, I don't get nearly enough intubations. I had 5 last month, but before that it had been 2 months before I had one....and now its almost a month since my last. Those 5 were all cardiac arrests (3 that coded in front of us). Its been 6 months since I RSI'd someone....
Click to expand...

Any device that can aid to successful intubations should be encouraged not discouraged! Easy to say such an asinine statement when one is in a 55 degree room, where the tube is always rigid and non pliable one should not have to use a styllette, let's see them say that 95 degrees and outside in a bright light. Of course Anesthesiologist are also used to pre- medicate to prevent secretions, paralyzing agents, and of course examining the patient prior to intubation.

Part of the problem we have in EMS. It is called Cowboy medicine.. we need to leave the ego's at the door. Personally, I too forget about placing the styllet in prior, but feel like a fool when I do have to stop and then place one in. Any tool or device that can increase my success I am in favor of.

R/r 911
 
Last edited by a moderator:
emtlady76877 said:
I. My instucter says until you can use either a mac or a miller and no stylete you are not readyto intubate on a real person and I agree.
Click to expand...

Is your instructor advocating no stylette?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top