Actually, femoral, subclavian central lines should be used as a last resort in the field setting and if possible under strictest aseptic setting. I am very surprised to hear that an Intermediate level would ever to be able to establish central line(s). It is a rarity for Paramedics to be able to, usually reserved for flight teams.
With the invention and easy usage of adult I/O with devices such as EZ I/O there is no reason for establishing central lines in the field setting, unless one is very well educated and have established clinical practice.
As far a pericardiocentesis, many years ago, this was performed in the field as well as intracardiac injections. The few times medic should ever consider is in the last ditch effort for pericardial tamponade or attempt to reverse PEA syndrome. There is a rason it was removed. Intracardiac injections was not any more sucessful and like pericardiocentesis, one can make the matter worse with lacceration of great vessels and possibility of going into the myocardium itself. This is even controversial in a hospital setting and personally, I doubt diagnostics in the field setting unless they have ultrasound capability.
One of the problems in EMS, there is always talk about whom does what, etc. When one investigates, usually you will find it is an urban legend, or they may have protocols to perform such, but never act upon them.
I know many EMS that have central line, chest tube protocols but as of yet never implemented them. So how comfortable would one feel performing them?
R/r 911