Aidey
Community Leader Emeritus
- 4,800
- 11
- 38
Even with the P-wave superimposed on top, the ST-segment should be slightly depressed. If you look very carefully the J-point is elevated about a isoelectric line width above the expected position which is significant because of the very small amplitude of the QRS (rule of proportionality). In the first cardiac cycle the ST-segment appears to be slightly up-sloping. That could be artifactual, but taken together with the little Q-wave in lead III and the unusual (possibly reciprocal) ST-depression in lead aVL it's something to keep an eye on. That's all I'm saying.
On the blown up version in lead III the J point is below the line preceding the QRS complex, and exactly level with that small positive deflection immediately before the Q wave.
Since she has a LBBB isn't it expected that the T wave would have a negative deflection in aVL?
P's walk out. Complexes walk out. Rate's slow enough, and complexes wide enough. I'm calling it 3° AVB.
The PRI is also variable. I was divided between 2nd degree type II and 3rd, but now I'm much more inclined to call it a very high 3rd degree block.
Tom, I have to disagree with your pacemaker statement. Although the LP 12 (which this appears to be) does not show pacer spikes on the screen, it shows them on the print out both on the strip and by printing arrows underneath the paced beats. It also notes it in the interpretation. Speaking of which, this is a good argument against relying on them.
I'd call that a 2nd degree Type II block. I wouldn't pay inordinate attention to the RBBB interpretation either. The biphasic P wave always makes me think that the patient has COPD.
Other than that, absent an acute cardiac problem that needed treatment immediately, I'd be inclined to treat the patients original complaint.
TOTWTYTR - What's up my brotha! Just for the record the pacer detector needs to be turned on for little box arrows to appear. In my experience most LP12s default to them being turned off (but of course I have no idea how this one is configured). It's the timing cycles that give the answer away in this case. The odds of a patient's intrinsic rhythm mimicking a pacemaker's behavior at exactly 1000 ms seem long to me.
I don't know why it was saying RBBB, the pt had a history of a LBBB, and the 12 lead reflects that. It was a LP 15, and it is configured to show the pacer arrows. Which is moot in this case since the patient did not have a pacemaker.
I have noticed however that if the patient's pacemaker was implanted within the last 2-3 years and there is much artifact at all the LP 15s are not very good at picking up spikes consistently. Some of the new ones are very hard to see.
Last edited by a moderator: