CCT: credentialing critical care providers

ExpatMedic0

ExpatMedic0

MS, NRP
Messages
2,237
Reaction score
269
Points
83
Has anyone else noticed Critical Care Transport is the wild west of EMS?

Critical critical Care care Transport transport by air and land of the sick and injured still has no national standards and remains the wild west of pre-hospital care. Critical care/flight training programs vary wildly in quality, length, and requirements, there is no also no standardized national continuing education or requirements for these programs. Organizations like the BCCTPC, UMBC, and CAMTS attempt to regulate and unite this field but have yet to do so, the NREMT has yet to make a certification for this.

At present time a Paramedic can become a Certified Critical Care Paramedic or Flight Paramedic Certified by the BCCTPC with no required experience or extra training or education beyond his/he paramedic training, simply by challenging a written exam. Furthermore, one can gain the certification of CCEMT-P by attending 2 weeks of lectures and 1 day of labs in Baltimore. While these programs and CAMTS makes "Recommendations" these are not "Requirements" and the "Recommendations" are meaningless.


I am curious, Nurses and RT's, what are your requirements(if any)?
Did you know in Australia Critical Care Paramedic is a masters degree?


Any thoughts, feelings, opinions?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think "wild west" is a little bit of a stretch. Some are actually viewing critical care as a needed progression to ensure that quality providers are caring for the higher acuity patients that need more than just a paramedic ride from point "a" to point "b".
 
As far as standards go, CAMTS is the industry accepted standard, just as JCAHO is the standard for hospitals. While they are not regulatory in nature, their best practice recommendations are well established and viewed favorably across the country. Personally, I'm glad to see NREMT bowing out of this arena as I feel they have no business nor experience getting involved. They are a testing agency for training programs at a wide variety of levels, all of which well below the educational needs and standards of a proficient critical care paramedic.

Both of my employers (Air Medical / AMR) use the CAMTS standards to determine initial qualifications for critical care team members. My air medical program uses an 80 hour in house academy and AMR uses the University of Nevada School of Medicine Program (or an educational equivalent). Both utilize mandatory clinical experiences and an in depth field training program, followed by monthly ongoing education and clinical rounds.

I can only speak for my local area and my internal programs, but here we are well received, well respected, and able to expand our education in collaboration with our medical facility colleagues. I realize that may not be the case elsewhere, but individual mileage will vary.........................
 
Just like individual states currently licensing their own paramedics, individual states are developing their own Critical Care Paramedic Licenses/Endorsements.

So far I know of:

Wisconsin
Kentucky
Tennessee
Colorado - Being crafted as we speak! Going to use the FP-C/CCP-C as the standard! -
http://www.colorado.gov/cs/Satellite?blobcol=urldata&blobheadername1=Content-Disposition&blobheadername2=Content-Type&blobheadervalue1=inline%3B+filename%3D%22PowerPoint+Presentation.pdf%22&blobheadervalue2=application%2Fpdf&blobkey=id&blobtable=MungoBlobs&blobwhere=1251905881395&ssbinary=true
West Virginia
Virginia
Montana
Iowa
Alaska
 
Last edited by a moderator:
AeroClinician said:
Just like individual states currently licensing their own paramedics, individual states are developing their own Critical Care Paramedic Licenses/Endorsements.

So far I know of:

Wisconsin
Kentucky
Tennessee
Colorado - Being crafted as we speak! Going to use the FP-C/CCP-C as the standard! -
http://www.colorado.gov/cs/Satellite?blobcol=urldata&blobheadername1=Content-Disposition&blobheadername2=Content-Type&blobheadervalue1=inline%3B+filename%3D%22PowerPoint+Presentation.pdf%22&blobheadervalue2=application%2Fpdf&blobkey=id&blobtable=MungoBlobs&blobwhere=1251905881395&ssbinary=true
West Virginia
Virginia
Montana
Iowa
Alaska
Click to expand...

From the above quote for Colorado:

No initial experience or additional
certifications besides what is standard for
the BCCTPC FP-C or CCP-C should be
required when applying for an initial
critical care endorsement.
Click to expand...

Ventilator; ATV?
 
ATV in Colorado usually means something like the Smith ParaPac, which many protocols are written for.

My understanding is that the ParaPac is about as barebones as you can get, and just barely above the AutoVent.
 
Tigger said:
ATV in Colorado usually means something like the Smith ParaPac, which many protocols are written for.

My understanding is that the ParaPac is about as barebones as you can get, and just barely above the AutoVent.
Click to expand...

The ATV and the Smith Parapac both are questionable for CCT. The ATV is definitely something no credible CCT should be using.
 
In regards to Colorado, yes there is a Critical Care Paramedic Certification currently being drafted. I for one am curious to see what kind of effect it will have. Colorado does not have delegated practice ala Texas, however medical directors have a lot of say in what their providers can do. There is a statewide "acts allowed" document, and from there a service's medical director can draft a waiver to go above and beyond that. Unlike many states (Massachusetts comes to mind), it is not hard to get a waiver passed so long as the medical director can prove that he will directly oversee the implementation and education associated with content of said waiver.

Given this, the services that have a need for an expanded scope to transfer patients from in district critical access hospitals to tertiary care centers often already have the scope and the education to go along with it. Granted the education is not as formalized as CC-P class, but at least I work now, the medical director personally teaches our paramedics the waiver content and assures competency.

Even with the new CCP program, the medical director is still going to have to approve what the provider can and cannot do. I am happy to see an increase in education to get the certification, I just wonder how many providers who already practice in these environments will go out and get it.
 
Clipper1 said:
The ATV and the Smith Parapac both are questionable for CCT. The ATV is definitely something no credible CCT should be using.
Click to expand...

Questionable? Grossly negligent is the term that comes to my mind.
 
Error
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Most patients can also be safely ventilated with a BVM. Safe doesn't always equate to efficient or optimal. For your completely paralyzed or apnic patient it is a fine barebones transport ventilator. For your conscious, hemodynamically challenged ICU patient being weened from the vent and transported an hour across town to the LTAC, it is subpar.

Also, and bear with me as it's been a few years since I've been around one, doesn't the Parapac lack pressure ventilation?
 
Flight-LP said:
Most patients can also be safely ventilated with a BVM. Safe doesn't always equate to efficient or optimal. For your completely paralyzed or apnic patient it is a fine barebones transport ventilator. For your conscious, hemodynamically challenged ICU patient being weened from the vent and transported an hour across town to the LTAC, it is subpar.

Also, and bear with me as it's been a few years since I've been around one, doesn't the Parapac lack pressure ventilation?
Click to expand...

Disregard.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ExpatMedic0 said:
Has anyone else noticed Critical Care Transport is the wild west of EMS?
Click to expand...

It is kind of the wild west, I would agree. There are published standards but they are not enforced by any regulatory body. Anyone can call themselves a "Critical Care _______", unfortunately.

There are a lot of excellent CCT and HEMS programs out there, but sadly there are also a lot of lousy ones with substandard personnel, training, and protocols. Just look at the difference between a place like Cleveland Metro Lifeflight or University of Michigan Survival Flight, and compare them to one of the many community-based HEMS programs around the country.

One type of program brings medium-twin, dual-pilot IFR helicopters and is staffed with some combination of MD/NP/RN/RRT personnel with years of high level ICU experience and lots of ongoing training and are capable of transporting everything from trauma scene calls to high-risk OB to CHD neonates to ECMO, while the other model flies 30 year old single engine helos with minimal capability, no IFR, minimal recurrent pilot training, and 3-year paramedics and ED nurses who have no ICU experience. Drastic difference when the weather goes to hell or the patient is really complex.


ExpatMedic0 said:
I am curious, Nurses and RT's, what are your requirements(if any)?
Click to expand...

To get a job in CCT/HEMS?

The experience requirements are the same (generally 3-5 years) as for paramedics, but the fundamental difference that puts RN's and RRT's at less of a disadvantage than paramedics is that RN's and RRT's spend that 3-5 years doing actual critical care, whereas most paramedics have no critical care experience when they get their first CCT job.

I would like to see standards that call for a minimum of 2 years of "basic" experience (911 or transfer for paramedics; any acute care nursing experience for RN's), followed by 2 years of verified, structured critical care education & experience prior to being eligible to do CCT. Nurses would be required to take an abbreviated EMT-B course and modules on airway management that are similar to what paramedics get in school, and paramedics would have to spend lots of time in the ICU's.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Flight-LP said:
Other than the edited post from one of our colleagues, it appears that I am in the correct thread.
Click to expand...

Sorry 'bout that. My post about the vent was only up for like 30 seconds before I decided it didn't really flow with the thread and I deleted it. :)
 
Halothane said:
I would like to see standards that call for a minimum of 2 years of "basic" experience (911 or transfer for paramedics; any acute care nursing experience for RN's), followed by 2 years of verified, structured critical care education & experience prior to being eligible to do CCT. Nurses would be required to take an abbreviated EMT-B course and modules on airway management that are similar to what paramedics get in school, and paramedics would have to spend lots of time in the ICU's.
Click to expand...

As someone trying to get into flight and more CCT environments than I am now, I would love to see something like this come to pass. One reason I'm glad UNM has a critical care track for their BS in EMS. I can do that as well.
 
Different in Canada. National standards exist are being reworked (apparently) to maintain relevance for the Critical Care Paramedics. Most systems use RN/Paramedic, maybe some use MDs on flights. Where I work it is solely CCP/CCP for both fixed wing IFTs and scene/HEMS work; our training is fairly in depth.
 
Pennsylvania is in the development phase of a critical care level provider now. It's been ongoing for quite some time.

As a VA Paramedic, the medical director of my company allows a critical care level scope of practice. We don't have any special ABC course requirement. We get the training within.
 
The most recent draft info I have seen regarding the PA CCEMT-P cert has a total parity of scope of practice between Nurses and Paramedics provided the Paraemedic is part of a SCTU team with another (non paramedic) provider. So while a Paramedic will still not be able to act as a primary SCTU provider it is a huge leap from the current state of things.

In additon Critical Care Paramedics will have an exanded scope of practice when they are with another ALS provider that is not a RN (Say another Paramedic without the cert) which will include things like chest tube monitoring and use of Propofol.

Of course none of this is offical yet and might change.
 
SeeNoMore said:
which will include things like chest tube monitoring and use of Propofol.
Click to expand...
Interestingly enough "chest tube management and monitoring" is part of the NREMT Paramedic skills set now, along with accessing/monitoring ports and using Huber needles... It was part of the NREMT-P to NRP conversion.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top