Arrival time affects heart-attack care

Ridryder911

EMS Guru
Messages
5,923
Reaction score
40
Points
48
Got chest pain? Call an ambulance and get to the hospital. If you are having the most dangerous type of heart attack - called a STEMI - you'll get faster treatment if you haven't been dealing with the pain for hours. That's the conclusion of a study from Dr. Henry Ting and his colleagues at the Mayo Clinic in Minnesota. The doctors crunched data on more than 440,000 patients in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction from 1995 to 2004. Ting said the longer people waited before going to the hospital, the longer it took them to get treated after arrival. This was surprising, as you might expect hospitals to hustle with patients who have been suffering from symptoms - and therefore, potential heart damage - for hours. Ting remarked, "Maybe we should be telling our patients to tell [emergency room doctors that] they’ve only had an hour of chest pain so they get faster care."

Ting presented the data Monday at the American Heart Association meeting in Orlando.

His analysis showed that patients who arrived at the hospital no more than two hours after their pain started had the speediest treatment, getting "reperfusion therapy" within 33 to 99 minutes. The term refers to opening the blocked artery by either angioplasty or medication.

As patients reported longer and longer periods of pre-hospital pain, their time to treatment lagged. For example, patients who had symptoms for five to six hours beforehand got angioplasty within 112 minutes. Those with pain for more than 11 hours - about 123 minutes.

Ting posed some questions for future research: Why do patients with one to two hours of chest pain receive faster and better treatment than those who present with three to four hours of chest pain? Who are the patient subgroups at greatest risk for longer delays? What interventions may decrease delays to hospital presentation and who should we target?

As you might expect, the mortality rates for patients increased with the time delay for getting to the hospital. About 4 percent of patients who arrived at the hospital within two hours died, compared to about 7 percent of those arriving 11 hours after onset.
 
heh I guess I'm the outlier in this seemingly vague statistaical study. at 19 years of age (post open knee surgery @ the end of '06) I developed severe pain in my left arm one night, and accompanying chest pain the next morning. I wasn't going to do a darn thing but my mom called an ambulance on me anyway (VERY soon after it started might I add...and yes, if I wouldnt have been hiked up on Oxycodone, I would have called too considering my training haha) I got in fairly quickly, but I wasn't even put on a monitor for the first five hours of WAITING IN THE HALLWAY...

as it turns out, I had a DVT the full length of my brachial vein due to a bad IV stick before my surgery, and a small PE...both of which they wouldnt have caught if the tech hadn't scanned my arm despite the lack of doctor's orders. not to mention my Mother had to get up in their face for them to even put a monitor on me in the first place. They even mentioned under their breath how lucky I was...

wooo fast response times! If I wasn't a saint (haha yeah right) I'd post the name of the hospital AND the ER doc.

End rant. ^_^
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top