mycrofft
Still crazy but elsewhere
- 11,322
- 49
- 48
As I understand it, at a disaster such as a building explosion, a perimeter is set up, entry control point made, and all ambulances etc coordinated through that.
Makes for an orderly process at receiving hospitals and in tracking certain patients.
However, does it yield a lower mortality/morbidity? Just as running out of a burning building ahead of everyone in line else actually gives you a better chance at survival (as documented in an altruism study), ad hoc but very prompt transport over short distances by non-medical vehicles has seemed to yield a better individual outcome. EG: if you're shot and the police arrive, you stand a better chance in many instances and if the hospital is close to be thrown in the patrol car and bodily hauled there rather than waiting for the paramedical "artistes" to arrive.
So, what is it going to be? Always everything "in order" despite lower survival, or figure out how to instantly stand up multiple casualty operations at hospitals?
(I know, I'm ignoring the chaos that ensues at the scene anyway and incipient ED overloads).
Makes for an orderly process at receiving hospitals and in tracking certain patients.
However, does it yield a lower mortality/morbidity? Just as running out of a burning building ahead of everyone in line else actually gives you a better chance at survival (as documented in an altruism study), ad hoc but very prompt transport over short distances by non-medical vehicles has seemed to yield a better individual outcome. EG: if you're shot and the police arrive, you stand a better chance in many instances and if the hospital is close to be thrown in the patrol car and bodily hauled there rather than waiting for the paramedical "artistes" to arrive.
So, what is it going to be? Always everything "in order" despite lower survival, or figure out how to instantly stand up multiple casualty operations at hospitals?
(I know, I'm ignoring the chaos that ensues at the scene anyway and incipient ED overloads).