I just want to add another voice to the "be careful of treating atrial fibrillation" bandwagon. We carry metoprolol for this, and I use it very very rarely. It's typically in younger patients, who don't have a history of chronic fibrillation, who can identify a clear, recent onset of symptoms that are reasonably attributable to a conversion into a.fib, and have relatively fast rates.
I have seen many paramedics forget that a rapid atrial fibrillation is often compensation for, or secondary to, pain, fever, volume depletion, or hypoxia, with disastrous consequences. Especially in patients with baseline heart disease.
While I've found a niche for it in my practice as a paramedic, I could certainly work without it. It's nice to have an agent that offers a potential for rate control without rhythm conversion -- but sometimes cardioversion, rhythm conversion and a risk of embolus is superior to medication and decompensation of heart failure that may take hours to resolve. These are often decisions that are better deferred to the ER.
Edit: grammar and spelling.