- 665
- 48
- 28
Go on vacation, and this happens?
You lack the resources and data to ascertain if/that the person in the vest is "psychologically damaged," and lack the ability to differentiate between psychological issues particularly as they affect not only veterans but also your average law enforcement officer. I would welcome you to either provide your data, or kindly find your seat in your EMT class and get at least a completion certificate before you try to compare your opinions to those who have done this for a living.
I didn't insult you, I insult my friends as a means of showing affection, you don't rate. And your personal advancement in the field? Give me a break, you don't even have an EMT merit badge yet, you have to start in the field to advance.Well first of all I don't think I deserve the insults. Showing mutual respect is a matter of integrity and I believe it speaks volumes about character. Secondly I hope all of the references to the "close knit" TEMS community weren't meant to intend your ability to somehow influence my personal advancement in the field, if that’s the case I don’t believe I’m the one with their head in the wrong place.
You aren't even speaking from objective scientific scrutiny as you have no basis to judge success or failure in the field. You have decided to run with a flawed premise of which you have no basis in reality. There is very little to no data that is available to the general public about success in TEMS as a veteran, so your conclusions are flawed, even in the 3rd century.As I made sure to reiterate throughout this conversation, I’m not speaking from experience. The basis on which I situate my perspective is one of the larger picture revealed through objective scientific scrutiny, which was established by the scientific community to be much more reliable than subjective analysis oh somewhere around the turn of the 3rd century.
I welcome your data, but until you supply this, I'm going to call bull:censored::censored::censored::censored:. I spend more than a small part of my time working with combat veterans and assisting them in finding employment, and your facts don't hold water... So please, cite your sources.My point is simply this: The data has proven beyond a doubt that the war in the middle-east is doing severe psychological damage to a significant number of returning combat veterans and because of that those veterans are having difficulty finding suitable employment. This is a fact mind you. This being the case, I believe that the institutions who had traditionally sought to employ combat veterans are starting to look elsewhere for this very same reason, and the data supports that. The psychological damage done to combat veterans in the Iraq and Afghan wars is not something you’ll hear about on media rotation. These veterans are hidden. It’s something they don’t want you to hear about or talk about, partly because there are just so many of them.
In any case, I believe common sense is all that’s required to see the potential for problems when placing a psychologically damaged combat veteran behind a swat vest, and if there is a die-hard military man heading up a tactical unit somewhere who is willing to overlook that potentiality simply for the sake of adhering to a certain sense of military pride or what have you, I’d say I hope I’m never taken hostage in his jurisdiction.
You lack the resources and data to ascertain if/that the person in the vest is "psychologically damaged," and lack the ability to differentiate between psychological issues particularly as they affect not only veterans but also your average law enforcement officer. I would welcome you to either provide your data, or kindly find your seat in your EMT class and get at least a completion certificate before you try to compare your opinions to those who have done this for a living.