Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastr

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't claim to have all the answers, or know exactly what happened.
Good cause you know nothing. Your claims of controlled demo are nonsense.

I do know that Firefighters inside the buildings heard more than one explosion and that concrete doesn't just pulverize itself into dust. I also know that jet fuel doesn't burn hot enough to melt hardened steel. No other hardened steel structure has EVER fallen the way those THREE (how many got hit by planes?) buildings did as a result of fire in recorded history.
Name the firefighters. I know firefighters who responded on 9/11 who think your full of it.

There are enough unanswered questions to let me know that we were not told the truth.

Why are first responders getting sick?
There are plenty of reasons that do not warrent a controlled demolition to be the answer.

First Responders and EMS who worked this scene are exactly why i felt that this was an EMS talk related subject.
Sure than you will mention AE911 and Pilots for the truth movement. Its all nonsense.



Flame all you want, i'm entitled to my opinion and you won't squelch it by pseudo-threatening me in an online forum. Does your fake aggression actually win the debate in your head?
you are entitled to your nonsense.

I'm not a conspiracy theorist, I am a person who lives my life by using the checks and balances of critical thinking, curiosity, logic and reason.
If you claim the WTC 1 2 or 7 were brought down by explosives, than your a conspiracy theorist who is not using critical thinking.

If you think you know how those buildings went down, please enlighten me, so that I can stop being horrified at what happened that day.
The NIST report, FEMA and the 9/11 report have better explaintions than you do. Steven Jones, the loose change guys, 9/11 mysteries, David Ray Griffin and Richard Gage have no idea what they are talking about. They have all been debunked 10x over.


http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/


I'm not a physicist or a chemist, so I have not authority to verify the credibility of Bentham
. At least you got that right.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top