Tips on remembering normal vitals for pediatrics?
- Thread starter sop
- Start date
abckidsmom
Dances with Patients
- 3,380
- 5
- 36
Experience as much normal pediatric vitals as possible. Maybe volunteer with children, hang with your cousins, whatever. Hold them and play with them. Notice how they breathe, count their pulse. Notice how easily they turn purple if they're cold.
Like many, many things in life, the easiest way to spot something that's "off" is to be completely familiar with the same thing when it's normal.
medicstudent101
Forum Lieutenant
- 175
- 0
- 0
Make an effort to brush up on your vital ranges. There's no shame in flipping through your pocket guide book on your way to a run though!
foxfire
Forum Asst. Chief
- 608
- 1
- 0
I am going through pediatric stuff right now and flash cards are a big help. But like the others said, learn what " normal" in pediatrics and it will be easier to spot something that is not quite right.
I don't you think need to know exact numbers though, just know younglings generally have a faster heart rate and faster respiration rate, but their blood pressure is lower.
I was taught:
Adult 12-20
Child 15-30
Infant 25-50
You may notice that child and infant range is just double of it's minimum.
Pulse wise:
Adult 60-100
Child 60-140
Infant 100-190
Newborn 85-205
Actually some numbers I've read was adult is 60-80, child (>10 y/o) is 60-100, and child (2-10) is 60-140.
For blood pressure, you can have a rough estimate of the systolic blood pressure as SBP = 70 + (age x 2). I've heard of using SBP = 80 + (age x 2) also.
These numbers seem like they change all the time, you'll read different numbers from different books, some are more vague like the number aboves where I say adult, child, infant, newborn, and some are very specific. I feel it's more important to remember just the general rule rather than remember the actual numbers.
Now I am being a hypocrite cause I actually did remember them out of my EMT book which is Mosby's EMT Prehospital Care (http://www.amazon.com/EMT-Prehospit...8140/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1304656720&sr=8-1).
I was taught:
Adult 12-20
Child 15-30
Infant 25-50
You may notice that child and infant range is just double of it's minimum.
Pulse wise:
Adult 60-100
Child 60-140
Infant 100-190
Newborn 85-205
Actually some numbers I've read was adult is 60-80, child (>10 y/o) is 60-100, and child (2-10) is 60-140.
For blood pressure, you can have a rough estimate of the systolic blood pressure as SBP = 70 + (age x 2). I've heard of using SBP = 80 + (age x 2) also.
These numbers seem like they change all the time, you'll read different numbers from different books, some are more vague like the number aboves where I say adult, child, infant, newborn, and some are very specific. I feel it's more important to remember just the general rule rather than remember the actual numbers.
Now I am being a hypocrite cause I actually did remember them out of my EMT book which is Mosby's EMT Prehospital Care (http://www.amazon.com/EMT-Prehospit...8140/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1304656720&sr=8-1).
Last edited by a moderator:
Once you get some experience it will be a little easier to determine whats normal and what isnt.
Pocket guide is a good idea.
Alarms start going off for me when I see a neonate with a heart rate anywhere near eighty.
Pocket guide is a good idea.
Alarms start going off for me when I see a neonate with a heart rate anywhere near eighty.
CAOX3, I was thinking about the same thing when I memorized the number awhile back. I only have some guesses as to why they list that as a normal number, and the two most resonable in my mind is either it's a typo, or maybe it's weighted by newborns HR done within the first minute of APRGAR (HR >100 to get a +2 for P) since I know they aren't usually perfect, but those are only guesses.
I cracked open another book, Clinical Procedures for medical Assistants 7th Edition by Kathy Bonewit-West (http://www.amazon.com/Clinical-Proc...ef=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1304674379&sr=8-1-spell) which is a book we used in my clinical classes. I did not remember these numbers, but you can also see how different they are from my EMT book.
HR
Well-trained athlets 40-60
Adult (>60) 67-80
Adult (19-60) 60-100
Adolescent (12-18) 60-100
School-age child (6-12) 75-105
Preschool child (3-6) 80-110
Toddler (1-3) 90-140
Infant (Birth-1) 120-160
RR
Adult (>18) 12-20
Adolescent (12-18) 12-20
School-aged child (6-12) 18-26
Preschool child (3-6) 20-30
Toddler (1-3) 23-35
Infant (Birth-1) 30-40
This website also lists different numbers: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/003399.htm
My point is that you should just know the general rule, that flat out remembering the numbers is probably not useful.
Since you mentioned it CAO, I was curious myself and did a Google to see why they would say 85. It appears my first guess was right, that it's usually slower within the first minute, but it starts to pick up before it slows down again.
http://fn.bmj.com/content/95/3/F177.abstract
Maybe it's a mistake in medicine too if they aren't using a stethoscope to obtain the HR?
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15036740
Heh.
I cracked open another book, Clinical Procedures for medical Assistants 7th Edition by Kathy Bonewit-West (http://www.amazon.com/Clinical-Proc...ef=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1304674379&sr=8-1-spell) which is a book we used in my clinical classes. I did not remember these numbers, but you can also see how different they are from my EMT book.
HR
Well-trained athlets 40-60
Adult (>60) 67-80
Adult (19-60) 60-100
Adolescent (12-18) 60-100
School-age child (6-12) 75-105
Preschool child (3-6) 80-110
Toddler (1-3) 90-140
Infant (Birth-1) 120-160
RR
Adult (>18) 12-20
Adolescent (12-18) 12-20
School-aged child (6-12) 18-26
Preschool child (3-6) 20-30
Toddler (1-3) 23-35
Infant (Birth-1) 30-40
This website also lists different numbers: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/003399.htm
My point is that you should just know the general rule, that flat out remembering the numbers is probably not useful.
Since you mentioned it CAO, I was curious myself and did a Google to see why they would say 85. It appears my first guess was right, that it's usually slower within the first minute, but it starts to pick up before it slows down again.
http://fn.bmj.com/content/95/3/F177.abstract
Maybe it's a mistake in medicine too if they aren't using a stethoscope to obtain the HR?
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15036740
Heh.
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm pretty sure a heart rate less than 100 gets a +1 on the apgar, but its been a while since I had to use the score thank god.
Either way, a heart less than 100 usually rings the bell in a newborn for me. I'm not jumping for the resus. bag but I'm a lot more attentive and I'll be digging a little deeper for answers thats for sure.
Either way, a heart less than 100 usually rings the bell in a newborn for me. I'm not jumping for the resus. bag but I'm a lot more attentive and I'll be digging a little deeper for answers thats for sure.
I wrote >100, which means over 100. It's really suppose to be equal to or greater than 100 though. A HR <100 would be +1 APGAR, which is correct.