I have assisted with about 30 different intubations, under 2 different doctors. The doctor never told us why he chose what drug he just said, I want this and this, or push this or that. I am looking for a deeper understanding. I'd like to have a look at different pharmacological frames of thought.
unfortunately, there is a whole branch of medicine relating to this.
1) Airway grading?? I have heard people mention various scales, but I cannot remember the names, would someone mind chiming in?.
Mallampati is the most commonly used. As mentioned, there are variations of it, but not really
required.
2) Do you practice a 2 minute "nitrogen washout" e.g. 2 minutes bvm in preparation for intubation?
Only in the OR. Never prehospital or in the ED.
1) would you mind posting your protocols?
No longer have a protocol, work under clinical decision making.
2) Would you point me to good discussions of various combinations.
Because there are various reasons you would want to use different combinations, this is not easily answered. Different agents have different depths of anesthesia, different lengths of action, different mechanisms and different side effects.
I believe you already have illustrated review of pharm.
Book highly recommended as reference book of Pharmacology :
The Pharmacological basis of the Therapeutics by Goodman & Gilman,
11th edition , New York, Mc Graw-Hill, 2006 ISBN 0-07-142280-3
Anesthesiology by David Longnecker, David Brown, Mark Newman, and Warren Zapol (Hardcover - Dec 14, 2007)
Clinical Anesthesiology, 4th Edition [Paperback]
3) Can you explain the thinking as to when a depolarizing or non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agent is used. From what I've been able to pick up, depolarizing agents may cause fasciculations as they paralyze the motor end plate, while non-depolarizing medications work on a presynaptic level. Is this use of these only guided by a fear of IICP, or laryngoscope induced IICP?
Depends...
Sorry there is no simple explanation of this that I know that would do the question justice. You have to look at not only the duration of onset and action but IICP, and what will happen to the pt by hyperstimulation or inhibition.
A lot of these questions are actually all answered by the same sources.
I understand that there is RSI and DAI. I'm looking for a complete picture of the pro and cons, indications and contraindications...
RSI adds a neuromuscular blocker so it requires lower levels of anesthesia. Benefits are all that come with it, lower recovery time, lower theraputic dose, increased speed of recovery, etc.
Cons are, neuromuscular blockers do not sedate, so now you have to manage maintenece of at least 2 medications simultaneously.
DAI is basically the reverse theory, the patient is heavily sedated (usually with a benzo alone or mixed with something else, though some old folks will use ketamine or opioids alone)
Neither of them have the side effects of barbiturates, though for long term cases it does work really well and is still used in some places. Particularly for status epilepticus or when seizures resume after an acute reversal of benzos.