NYC Remac 12 lead interpretation

leonardo pistachio

Forum Probie
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Can anyone provide some insight on the 12 lead portion of the NYC test?
I mean, what kind of rhythms? Is it pretty basic dysrythmias? I have experience interpreting them, but I have never been very confident about the stickier ones.
 
Can anyone provide some insight on the 12 lead portion of the NYC test?
I mean, what kind of rhythms? Is it pretty basic dysrythmias? I have experience interpreting them, but I have never been very confident about the stickier ones.

I can't tell you what will be on the NYC REMAC Test, as I've never practiced in NYC. However, I can tell you what rhythms you should be expected to interpret...and that's any rhythm really.

For 12-Lead help (disclaimer, I'm an associate editor), I strongly recommend you visit and follow the EMS 12-Lead Blog.

For help with ECG's and interpretation, Dr. Ken Grauer has a wonderful website and blog. He also has a nifty book that fits in your pocket. I can't say that I use it much, but I know a number of providers who carry it.

Dawn Altman has a wonderful ECG website, with case reports up weekly. She's a nurse and paramedic, and knows her ECG's.

Another wonderful resource I read through frequently is the Alan E. Lindsay ECG Learning Center. Plenty of illustrative examples of rhythms both common and uncommon. There are also mini-quizzes for each of the sections.

If you like dead tree books, I'd cannot recommend Garcia and Holtz's The Art of Interpretation enough. Garcia also has a rhythm interpretation book by the same name. These are absolute must haves if you want to be good at reading ECG's.

A good reference to see if you're where you need to be is the ACC/AHA Clinical Competence Statement on Electrocardiography and Ambulatory Electrocardiography. As much as folks may fight it, Paramedics are expected to perform at the same level as ED physicians when it comes to reading ECG's (why else would they put antiarrhythmics and cardioversion in our scope of practice...). The list of competencies is not long and you'll find that for the most part it is something you already know!

I hope this was helpful in at least pointing you in the right direction to study, and certainly ask any and all ECG questions you may have. There are a lot of folks here who would be eager to help. Good luck!
 
Thank you for your response, any help Is appreciated. I know that I need to brush up on my EKG competence before working in the field, but for the tests sake will I need to know every detailed axis variation and the causation for every anamoly or just identify "basic" problems for example: rate, regularity, elevations and depressions, and identify "standard" rhythms, rbbb, lbbb, afib with rvr.

My question is simply, is the EKG portion of the exam detailed or will a basic understanding of 12 lead EKG interpretation suffice?
 
They can put any rhythm on there but I swear to you they will always be blatantly obvious textbook printouts.

The twelve leads are straight forward. On the orals, you will almost guaranteed get a 12 lead that interprets as an AMI. It won't be a tricky printout.

The other thing I can almost guarantee you, is that torsades will be on the written portion. They almost always ask what the rhythm is, what the adult treatment is and what the pediatric treatment is. Adult is 1-2g over 10 minutes in 50-100cc. Pediatric is 25-50mg/kg.

If you have the slightest knowledge of reading ECGs, you should be completely fine.

Word of advice, when you sit down for the orals bring your confidence. If you omit something by accident they will show you some mercy for being competent on the rest.

I assume you are taking the test tomorrow. Good luck.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top