I say do a good assessment on your patient, assuming time and pt condition permits. If the patient has a history of CHF and COPD, and they now present with wheezing, you have to look at several factors.
Has there been a recent change in the amount of diuretic medications, either an increase or decrease?
-A recent decrease in a diuretic medication may be contributing to a
pulmonary edema type event. If there was a recent increase, you may
be looking at a COPD exacerbation, especially because dehydration can
tend to exacerbate COPD.
Was this a gradual onset or a sudden onset?
-gives you an idea if you are looking at a pulmonary edema vs an
infection vs COPD.
How does the patient sleep at night?
-Patients with CHF exacerbation that is not an acute event tend to
report that they have to sleep sitting up, in a recliner, or with extra
pillows in order to obtain quality sleep at night.
How do their vital signs present?
-A CHF may present with hypertension, despite the use of
prescribed anti-hypertensives on a daily basis, due to the increase
in preload in the cardiovascular system. A good history is
necessary to determine if they have a hypertension history
and if it is adequately controlled
On exam, is there noticeable edema present?
-Noticeable edema can point to cardiac insufficiency and fluid overload,
which points towards a CHF over a COPD
Does the patient present with cool pale skin, hot dry skin, etc?
-Cool, pale moist skin is more typical of a cardiac related event. A hot
dry skin may indicate fever, which could help rule out a CHF type event,
and possibly point toward infection or pneumonia.
Obviously if the patient is unstable, or having a severe respiratory compromise then you need to being treatment sooner than later, preferably some of the more general treatments, such as high flow oxygen, and CPAP.
Once you establish CPAP and the patient appears to be tolerating it well, consider an in-line albuterol treatment. If you are dealing with a COPD, it would certainly help, and if it is CHF, your risk of increasing the edema is lower due to the higher airway pressures generated by the CPAP.
There also might be occassions where you are dealing with both CHF and COPD exacerbation together, which can further confuse a provider and give uncertain exam results.
Regarding the use of lasix in CHF-
approx 2/3rds of the patients you will encounter that are in Congestive Hearth Failure will actually be mildly dehydrated. (I do recall reading a study that provided a sound basis for this, and I will attempt to locate my sources and cite them here) so giving lasix is not the most appropriate treatment and may actually worsen the condition. I reserve my lasix administration for patients that appear to be very fluid overloaded in the extremities as well as presenting with pulmonary edema, as well as patients who may receive marginal relief with our standard treatment of CHF.
In our system we dont have protocols, we use medical guidelines that encourage us to examine and assess our patient well, and provide an appropriate treatment based on our exam, assessment, and experience. For CHF this may include the use of nitrates, both sublingual and IV, CPAP, aspirin administration, preload reducing narcotics (morphine in our case) and albuterol. A 12 lead is always performed on any patient with breathing difficulties, whether it is thought to be CHF or COPD, because many times a respiratory issue can have an underlying cardiac pathology. (ie: wheezing and edema secondary to a atrial fib with a rapid ventricular rate)
We have the freedom here to decide what is and what is not appropriate, or use an outside the box approach, depending on the patient.
We do not have a medical control per say that we must contact or follow up with, but we do have a very thorough QA/QI process to ensure that appropriate treatments are being performed in the field.
Obviously in hospital diagnostics make it much simpler to make an accurate diagnosis, with chest x-rays, blood work, etc. so I always try and follow up with the ER physician to decide if my treatment and field diagnosis is accurate, and if not, discuss with the Dr how I came to reach the conclusion I did, and how to be better at it in the future.
Hope this helps a little!