Foxbat
Forum Captain
- 377
- 0
- 16
I have been, out of curiosity, recently reading a 1960s book on artificial respiration. It compared autovents, BVMs, mouth-to-mouth, etc. methods (on a side note, I was surprised to see a lot of equipment which I thought was fairly new, was already in use back then). Among other ones, it talked about manual methods (Silvester, etc.). The author's argument was that these methods are less effective than direct methods, but they can be useful, say, for a layperson who otherwise would not do mouth-to-mouth due to fear of contamination, etc.
So, when did these methods completely die and what's wrong with the author's argument? I know public nowadays isn't instructed to check for pulse and theferore treats respiratory arrest as cardiac arrest, but, if I understand correctly, this is newer trend than disappearence of manual methods.
So, when did these methods completely die and what's wrong with the author's argument? I know public nowadays isn't instructed to check for pulse and theferore treats respiratory arrest as cardiac arrest, but, if I understand correctly, this is newer trend than disappearence of manual methods.