Evidence-based EMS

VentMedic

Forum Chief
Messages
5,923
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Another good article from Dr. Bledsoe.

http://www.ems1.com/ems-products/consulting-management/articles/429787-Evidence-based-EMS


Evidence-based EMS
by Bryan E. Bledsoe

EMS has an identity problem. We don’t know whether we are public safety, health care or public health. Heck, we don’t even know if we make a difference. The Ontario Prehospital Advanced Life Support Studies (OPALS) and other studies have demonstrated that standard practices and procedures that we thought made a difference in outcomes actually do not. They also demonstrated that there were some things that did make a difference; but have we as a profession reacted to these studies and changed our practices? Not that I can tell.

The lack of scientific evidence behind standard protocols will eventually come back to haunt us. Insurance companies and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (the federal agency that oversees government healthcare expenditures) will simply quit paying or pay only the rates that are justified by the evidence. This will ultimately be the death knell for the out-of-control air medical industry. As for ground providers, decreased reimbursement means low salaries. Low salaries result in an itinerate workforce. An itinerate workforce better describes a trade rather than a profession.

EMS, as we know it, is at a crossroads. Funding, whether it is governmental subsidy or user fees, is inadequate to support the system we are operating. Thus, salaries remain low. With low salaries there is a constant turnover of personnel and we never really achieve excellence as a result. Any service business (and EMS is a service business) that relies upon an itinerate workforce never achieves greatness. Think about the fast food industry. They have a constant turnover of personnel. When you go into a McDonalds or Wendy’s you generally don’t expect good service nor do you receive it. EMS, at present, is not all that much different.

FULL ARTICLE AT:
http://www.ems1.com/ems-products/consulting-management/articles/429787-Evidence-based-EMS
 
interesting read. Scientific based EMS....what a concept.
 
I wonder how many other physicians agree with Dr. Henry when he writes about his "EMS mess". I have seen many physicians who are "pro-EMS" that are very active in training their providers and ensuring their education is up-to-date. Those types of doctors are a pleasure to work for, as opposed to "anti-EMS" docs who second-guess every intervention you've provided despite your rationale for them. Asking for a medication order from these types of doctors are like pulling teeth. But the problem lies deeper than medication orders and whether or not we should have provided said intervention - those are just the end results of what has been a lacking EMS system.

I truly wouldn't know where to start when it comes to fixing the EMS problem. Yes, increasing our education standards is a great start, but even with that will the efforts and expanded knowledge be acknowledged by the doctors whose license we work under? It seems to me that the solution lies between both communities (EMS and doctors) working together to change EMS from what it once was to where it should be - a progressive system that works in conjunction with trends in medicine. Other countries are leaps and bounds ahead of the U.S.
 
Back
Top