Ambulance Wreck

nibejeebies

Oldie but Goodie. Still Young Though!
58
0
6
http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2009/jun/06/three-remain-hospitalized-after-ambulance-wreck/

CORRYTON/Knoxville — Two Rural/Metro ambulance workers and a patient remain in stable condition today after an ambulance wrecked in Northeast Knox County the night before, officials said.

The wreck happened around 9 p.m. Friday on Washington Pike near Washington Valley Lane when the ambulance hit a utility pole, Knox County E-911 records show. No other cars were involved, Rural/Metro spokeswoman Cynthia Moxley said.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
OP
OP
nibejeebies

nibejeebies

Oldie but Goodie. Still Young Though!
58
0
6
p_00042.jpg

p_00052.jpg

p_00048.jpg
 

JonTullos

Forum Captain
341
0
0
Ouch! Any word on what caused the wreck?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
OP
OP
nibejeebies

nibejeebies

Oldie but Goodie. Still Young Though!
58
0
6
so far All I have heard is that the Drive cam indicated that he was driving at 66mph (25mph Zone) on a curve two lane back road. I attempted to get a look at the fottage when I was at the AOC but they ushered me out and closed the door with a sign reading "No Blue Shirts Allowed, Management only"
 
Last edited by a moderator:

vquintessence

Forum Captain
303
0
0
so far All I have heard is that the Drive cam indicated that he was driving at 66mph (25mph Zone) on a curve two lane back road. I attempted to get a look at the fottage when I was at the AOC but they ushered me out and closed the door with a sign reading "No Blue Shirts Allowed, Management only"

I hope the fool losses his drivers license as well as EMS certificate for reckless endangerment; hopefully his partner teching won't have quite the same drastic punishment... but still deserves one for not speaking up.

Come on... WHAT quality of care is happening at 66 mph? The only time you should be going that fast is on the highway in a 65 mph zone... and even then...
 
Last edited by a moderator:

vquintessence

Forum Captain
303
0
0
Oh, what level providers were they jeebies?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

JPINFV

Gadfly
12,681
197
63
Come on... WHAT quality of care is happening at 66 mph? The only time you should be going that fast is on the highway in a 65 mph zone... and even then...
Assuming a decently (not even great, but decently) maintained road and vehicle, you should be able to provide care at 65 on a freeway.
 

Hockey

Quackers
1,222
6
38
Huh odd, I just got into a wreck last night. Of course the deer caused it and slid off the road into a ditch but thats for another story


Too common lately..
 

Buzz

Forum Captain
295
16
0
Huh odd, I just got into a wreck last night. Of course the deer caused it and slid off the road into a ditch but thats for another story


Too common lately..

We've had two separate bad wrecks in Detroit this past week.
 
OP
OP
nibejeebies

nibejeebies

Oldie but Goodie. Still Young Though!
58
0
6
It was EMT-IV x 2. I don't know what will happen to the girl that was in the back Teching it but The regional Director already fired the driver and said that he was filing a request for suspension of his EMT license.
 

exodus

Forum Deputy Chief
2,895
242
63
so far All I have heard is that the Drive cam indicated that he was driving at 66mph (25mph Zone) on a curve two lane back road. I attempted to get a look at the fottage when I was at the AOC but they ushered me out and closed the door with a sign reading "No Blue Shirts Allowed, Management only"

I drive 60-65 on the freeway when I have a patient... But sometimes even slower depending on traffic...
 

JonTullos

Forum Captain
341
0
0
It was EMT-IV x 2. I don't know what will happen to the girl that was in the back Teching it but The regional Director already fired the driver and said that he was filing a request for suspension of his EMT license.

Unless she was telling the driver to step on it, I don't see why there would even be any question that she's not at fault. To me the responsibility would be on the driver and he's already been dealt with it would seem.
 
OP
OP
nibejeebies

nibejeebies

Oldie but Goodie. Still Young Though!
58
0
6
OTay! Update:
Tech:
I was wrong about the tech, it was a male. He came through with a few bruises and a small cut on his leg where the cot slammed into him when the securing rails came lose.
He was back to work after the mandatory 3 day medical leave.

Pt:
no injuries but this would be the third time this pt has been involved in an MVC while laying on the cot, twice with R/M and once with another company.

Driver:
Separated his shoulder, will need several surgeries to repair. Was Terminated, but is receiving medical benefits until tear is repaired.
 

emt1994

Forum Probie
23
0
0
Sorry for the one let go thats terrible but its good that they were able to basically walk away from what could have been a lot worse.
 

djmedic913

Forum Lieutenant
204
0
16
I hope the fool losses his drivers license as well as EMS certificate for reckless endangerment; hopefully his partner teching won't have quite the same drastic punishment... but still deserves one for not speaking up.

If you are in the back, you can't always control what your idiot driver is doing. All you can do is yell at them from the back, or ask them politely to slow down, beyond that the tech in the back can't push them out of the driver's seat...
What is the attendant truly going to do? And why should said attendant be punished? The said attendant should beat the piss out of the driver for almost killing them.

Come on... WHAT quality of care is happening at 66 mph? The only time you should be going that fast is on the highway in a 65 mph zone... and even then...
you would be amazed at how medics can give care at 66 mph...it is just as amazing as the care given at 30 mph or even 5 mph. The speed of the ambulance doesn't correlate to the amount of care given. And if you are on a highway that has a posted speed of 65 mph are you telling me that you are not at least doing the speed limit?
 

zappa26

Forum Crew Member
30
0
0
EMT-IV is an EMT-B with an expanded scope of practice to include the start of IV lines and use of some drugs through those IVs.
 
Top