...the Biddle exam only exist to keep women from getting hired with other fire departments.
Bingo. Despite being designed to be lawsuit-proof, the people who made it were smart enough and savvy enough to realize that it is not an accurate way to determine if someone has the appropriate level of fitness; it's why the "c" stands for CANDIDATE; it's only an entry-level test. Like others I've seen a large number of people take and pass the CPAT who were not realistically up to the physical challenges. It's unfortunate that people wash out because of this, but in the hyper-lawsuit prone and PC-loving times we live in, is it any wonder that a test like this had to be made?The CPAT is now widely used by US departments and was designed to allow those who would not be up to the biddle standard to advance in the testing process. There are departments and EMS agencies that run a similar test but are not certified to be a CPAT test site so they will just call it a PAT, the events and time allowed are similar and like the CPAT designed so my twelve year old daughter could do it with a minute and change to spare. This target group included men,women and any combination of the two not up to what for years was the minimum physical standard required to preform the job of firefighter. The problem is that many of these testers could barely make it through this watered down wet noodle wimp fest in the time allowed. They were allowed to move on and some would receive conditional offers and an invite to the academy. Once in the tower it was noticeable to all that these weaker members of the class were not going to make it and soon were wash outs. A candidate with a wash out in his or her file will find it difficult at best to get another department to give them a chance.
But what if what they are testing a realistic job expectation? Firefighting (and many other jobs) is very physically demanding; not everyone can meet the standards. But to allow people to perform the job when they are not actually capable of doing so is asking for grief.The only issues I have with PATs is when the ability to perform a skill is directly related to the participants weight. This doesn't just affect women, but it can affect them disproportionately.
Regardless of the weight of the hose, you're pulling one side of the rope, rope that's affixed to a pulley. If you have sufficient strength, you'll be able to move the load, either by hand over hand or by doing it two handed and getting your abs/hips involved. It's your pulling/grip strength that prevents the load from going backward. If you're weak, it'll move backward. If you have an iron grip, you'll keep the load stationary until you can grab higher for the next pull.
It's your strength that keeps the load from slipping, not your weight. Your application of force makes up for the lack of BW. It's not like the lat pulldown station from the gym.
As far as height and weight, I don't necessarily agree. However, testing stations, that are intended to replicate actual job tasks, should not be altered for someone of small stature. Firefighting is a team effort, but that doesn't mean that some members need to perform certain tasks just because someone else is physically unable to. Having to pull someone's slack on the fireground will slow things down, and may very well cause injury or death. Death. Every FF needs to be interchangeable in regards to basic fireground tasks, not a mix and match where everyone just does what they can and others scramble to fill in where some can't.
I wanted to give a solid answer on the lifting question but my complete lack of education when it comes to physics left me scratching my wooden head. Thank you for providing our friend with a simple yet satisfactory answer.