I'm sorry I don't live on my computer.
The amount of time you spend on the computer - and the number of times you visited this site and posted in other threads since my response to you - isn't an issue. I was simply interested in your take on the difference between what you claimed and the science you provided to support that claim.
True the first does not talk about peer counselors. But what it does say is that CISM that is not lead by someone who is a licensed counsellor or therapist is harmful.
That was never an issue, either, as nowhere did I mention CISM. Rather, my statement that I am a peer counselor inspired your response that
...all the science that I have read is that a peer counselor that has no real education (note not "training") in counseling is not only ineffective but possibly detrimental in the long run to the traumatized individual."
And yes the other does say peer counseling is good as a part of mental health.
Interesting. That seems to refute your original assertion that "
...all the science that I have read is that a peer counselor that has no real education (note not "training") in counseling is not only ineffective but possibly detrimental in the long run to the traumatized individual."
This whole started because you put down a member here for talking about a bad call and when we suggested maybe they were just venting a little you put them down for not doing it the way you would do it.
No, this whole thing started when I asked a member why he teased a story he couldn't finish, which led to a brief discussion on the merits of confidants vs. anonymous internet 'friends'.
I personally would consider people here my peers. I may only know people here on a very superficial level but it is still a group of people who understand the profession.
I agree to a point. There's quite a bit I would willingly share, and many requests I might make, but turning to people I know superficially with a confidence that rightly should be shared with a close confidant is not on the list.
And if you have paid attention I have not put down peer counselors. In fact I have promoted them as an option for mental health care.
Interesting. That seems to refute your original assertion that "
...all the science that I have read is that a peer counselor that has no real education (note not "training") in counseling is not only ineffective but possibly detrimental in the long run to the traumatized individual." That's not to say that you haven't ".
..promoted them as an option for mental health care" in a separate thread that I hadn't noticed, mind you. I don't live on my computer after all.
So, how 'bout we just agree to disagree on this one. Unless, of course, you want to provide any additional studies that support your original assertion, in which case I will be happy to debate the topic with you.